A Critical Analysis of Eight-Electromagnet Manipulation Systems: The Role of Electromagnet Configuration on Strength, Isotropy, and Access

It is known that in the creation of isotropic magnetic manipulation systems using a set of stationary electromagnets, eight electromagnets are necessary to ensure that there are no singularities in the workspace. A variety of eight-electromagnet configurations have been proposed to date. In the first contribution of this letter, we conduct a critical comparison of these proposed configurations, and find that certain configurations are superior in terms of field and torque generation, whereas others are superior in terms of force generation due to the spatial derivative of the field. All of the prior configurations comprise a high degree of symmetry, yet access to the workspace varies widely between designs. In the second contribution of this letter, we propose a new configuration that does not comprise the symmetry seen in prior systems, and also provides more open access to the manipulation workspace than prior systems, yet still exhibits an isotropic workspace with comparable performance to prior systems. We conclude that designers of isotropic eight-electromagnet manipulation systems should not feel obliged to incorporate symmetry into their design.

[1]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Estimation-Based Control of a Magnetic Endoscope without Device Localization , 2017, J. Medical Robotics Res..

[2]  M. Sitti,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Programmable Assembly by Untethered Magnetic Robotic Micro‐Grippers , 2014 .

[3]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Micro-Scale Mobile Robotics , 2013, Found. Trends Robotics.

[4]  Eric David Diller Remote Actuation and Control of Multiple Magnetic Micro-Robots , 2013 .

[5]  Jake J. Abbott,et al.  Factors affecting the design of untethered magnetic haptic interfaces , 2014, 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).

[6]  Sandro Erni,et al.  Comparison, optimization, and limitations of magnetic manipulation systems , 2013 .

[7]  Ioannis K. Kaliakatsos,et al.  Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  Sandro Erni,et al.  MiniMag: A Hemispherical Electromagnetic System for 5-DOF Wireless Micromanipulation , 2010, ISER.

[9]  Islam S. M. Khalil,et al.  Three-dimensional closed-loop control of self-propelled microjets , 2013 .

[10]  Jake J. Abbott,et al.  Optimization of Coreless Electromagnets to Maximize Field Generation for Magnetic Manipulation Systems , 2017, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[11]  Jake J. Abbott,et al.  OctoMag: An Electromagnetic System for 5-DOF Wireless Micromanipulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Minimum Bounds on the Number of Electromagnets Required for Remote Magnetic Manipulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  J. English,et al.  Effectiveness of haptic feedback in open surgery simulation and training systems. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.