Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications

A common assumption in studies of interruptions is that one is focused in an activity and then distracted by other stimuli. We take the reverse perspective and examine whether one might first be in an attentional state that makes one susceptible to communications typically associated with distraction. We explore the confluence of multitasking and workplace communications from three temporal perspectives -- prior to an interaction, when tasks and communications are interleaved, and at the end of the day. Using logging techniques and experience sampling, we observed 32 employees in situ for five days. We found that certain attentional states lead people to be more susceptible to particular types of interaction. Rote work is followed by more Facebook or face-to-face interaction. Focused and aroused states are followed by more email. The more time in email and face-fo-face interaction, and the more total screen switches, the less productive people feel at the day's end. We present the notion of emotional homeostasis along with new directions for multitasking research.

[1]  Gloria Mark,et al.  The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress , 2008, CHI.

[2]  Joel M. Hektner,et al.  Experience sampling method , 2007 .

[3]  Víctor M. González,et al.  Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption , 2011, CHI.

[4]  Paul Johns,et al.  Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace , 2014, CHI.

[5]  A. Wolters,et al.  Dynamics in Psychology , 1943, Nature.

[6]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[7]  G. Chrousos,et al.  The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. , 1992, JAMA.

[8]  K. Lewin,et al.  Defining the 'field at a given time' , 2011 .

[9]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2014, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[10]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information, Technology and Information Worker Productivity , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Jalan Taylor,et al.  Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communication: Exploring Employees' Preference of Effective Employee Communication Channel , 2010 .

[12]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity , 2014, CHI.

[13]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Self-interruptions in discretionary multitasking , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Shahram Izadi,et al.  SenseCam: A Retrospective Memory Aid , 2006, UbiComp.

[16]  R. Buck.  Social and emotional functions in facial expression and communication: the readout hypothesis , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[18]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  A diary study of task switching and interruptions , 2004, CHI.

[19]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[20]  David M. Frohlich,et al.  Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[21]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Human Threat Management Systems: Self-protection and Disease Avoidance , 2022 .

[22]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[23]  Fritz Heider,et al.  Social perception and phenomenal causality. , 1944 .

[24]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[25]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[26]  David T. Neal,et al.  A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. , 2007, Psychological review.

[27]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions , 2007, CHI.

[28]  U. Renker.  [Motivation for work]. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[29]  Víctor M. González,et al.  No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work , 2005, CHI.

[30]  Alicia A. Grandey,et al.  Affective States and Traits in the Workplace: Diary and Survey Data from Young Workers , 2002 .

[31]  Paul Johns,et al.  Capturing the mood: facebook and face-to-face encounters in the workplace , 2014, CSCW.