Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Interplay Effect Evaluation of Asymmetric Breathing with Simultaneous Uncertainty Considerations in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is sensitive to uncertainties from patient setup and proton beam range, as well as interplay effect. In addition, respiratory motion may vary from cycle to cycle, and also from day to day. These uncertainties can severely degrade the original plan quality and potentially affect patient's outcome. In this work, we developed a new tool to comprehensively consider the impact of all these uncertainties and provide plan robustness evaluation under them. METHODS We developed a comprehensive plan robustness evaluation tool that considered both uncertainties from patient setup and proton beam range, as well as respiratory motion simultaneously. To mimic patients' respiratory motion, the time spent in each phase was randomly sampled based on patient-specific breathing pattern parameters as acquired during the 4D-CT simulation. Spots were then assigned to one specific phase according to the temporal relationship between spot delivery sequence and patients' respiratory motion. Dose in each phase was calculated by summing contributions from all the spots delivered in that phase. The final 4D dynamic dose was obtained by deforming all doses in each phase to the maximum exhalation phase. Three hundred (300) scenarios (10 different breathing patterns with 30 different setup and range uncertainty scenario combinations) were calculated for each plan. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) band method was used to assess plan robustness. Benchmarking the tool as an application's example, we compared plan robustness under both 3D and 4D robustly optimized IMPT plans for 10 non-randomly selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. RESULTS The developed comprehensive plan robustness tool had been successfully applied to compare the plan robustness between 3D and 4D robustly optimized IMPT plans for 10 lung cancer patients. In the presence of interplay effect with uncertainties considered simultaneously, 4D robustly optimized plans provided significantly better CTV coverage (D95% , p=0.002), CTV homogeneity (D5% -D95% , p=0.002) with less target hot spots (D5% , p=0.002), and target coverage robustness (CTV D95% bandwidth, p=0.004) compared to 3D robustly optimized plans. Superior dose sparing of normal lung (lung Dmean , p=0.020) favoring 4D plans and comparable normal tissue sparing including esophagus, heart, and spinal cord for both 3D and 4D plans were observed. The calculation time for all patients included in this study was 11.4±2.6 minutes. CONCLUSION A comprehensive plan robustness evaluation tool was successfully developed and benchmarked for plan robustness evaluation in the presence of interplay effect, setup and range uncertainties. The very high efficiency of this tool marks its clinical adaptation highly practical and versatile, including possible real-time intra-fractional interplay effect evaluation as a potential application for future use.

[1]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for clinically challenging cases of centrally and superiorly located stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Christoph Bert,et al.  Simulations to design an online motion compensation system for scanned particle beams , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  S. Schild,et al.  Exploratory study of the association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan robustness with local failure in head and neck cancer , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  Timothy D. Solberg,et al.  Phase versus amplitude sorting of 4D‐CT data , 2006, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[5]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust radiotherapy planning , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  S. Schild,et al.  Hybrid 3D analytical Linear Energy Transfer calculation algorithm based on pre-calculated data from Monte Carlo simulations. , 2019, Medical physics.

[7]  Jie Shan,et al.  Clinical Validation of a Ray-Casting Analytical Dose Engine for Spot Scanning Proton Delivery Systems , 2019, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[8]  A J Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  T. Sio,et al.  Technical Note: Treatment Planning System (TPS) Approximations Matter ─ Comparing Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Plan Quality and Robustness between a Commercial and an In-house Developed TPS for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). , 2019, Medical physics.

[10]  U Oelfke,et al.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint , 2018, Medical physics.

[12]  C. Ling,et al.  Respiration-correlated spiral CT: a method of measuring respiratory-induced anatomic motion for radiation treatment planning. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  S. Schild,et al.  Robust Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy to Redistribute High Linear Energy Transfer (LET) from Nearby Critical Organs to Tumors in Head and Neck Cancer. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Mohan,et al.  Effects of respiratory motion on passively scattered proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon therapy for stage III lung cancer: are proton plans more sensitive to breathing motion? , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  T. Sio,et al.  Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[16]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Four-dimensional computed tomography: image formation and clinical protocol. , 2005, Medical physics.

[17]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[18]  Kevin Souris,et al.  Towards fast and robust 4D optimization for moving tumors with scanned proton therapy. , 2019, Medical physics.

[19]  Matthias Fippel,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  E Heath,et al.  Dosimetric consequences of tumour motion due to respiration for a scanned proton beam , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Wei Liu,et al.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Thomas Bortfeld,et al.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning. , 2008, Medical physics.

[23]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Virtual 4DCT from 4DMRI for the management of respiratory motion in carbon ion therapy of abdominal tumors. , 2019, Medical physics.

[24]  Wei Chen,et al.  Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  J. Ashman,et al.  Proton beam therapy for locally advanced lung cancer: A review. , 2014, World journal of clinical oncology.

[26]  James Shackleford,et al.  Motion interplay as a function of patient parameters and spot size in spot scanning proton therapy for lung cancer. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Paul Keall,et al.  Investigating the Feasibility of Rapid MRI for Image-Guided Motion Management in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy , 2014, BioMed research international.

[28]  R. Mohan,et al.  Acquiring a four-dimensional computed tomography dataset using an external respiratory signal. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Li Liao,et al.  Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer. , 2016, Medical physics.

[30]  Oliver Blanck,et al.  4D robust optimization in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[31]  Kevin Souris,et al.  Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy. , 2019, Medical physics.

[32]  John N Tsitsiklis,et al.  A robust approach to IMRT optimization , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Wei Liu,et al.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  Antje-Christin Knopf,et al.  Scanned proton radiotherapy for mobile targets—the effectiveness of re-scanning in the context of different treatment planning approaches and for different motion characteristics , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Rajiv Chopra,et al.  Characterizing spatiotemporal information loss in sparse-sampling-based dynamic MRI for monitoring respiration-induced tumor motion in radiotherapy. , 2016, Medical physics.

[36]  Rosalind Perrin,et al.  Four-Dimensional Dose Reconstruction for Scanned Proton Therapy Using Liver 4DCT-MRI. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  Joao Seco,et al.  Breathing interplay effects during proton beam scanning: simulation and statistical analysis , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Rosalind Perrin,et al.  Respiratory motion-management in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer - A dosimetric comparison in an anthropomorphic lung phantom (LuCa). , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Incorporating uncertainties in respiratory motion into 4D treatment plan optimization. , 2009, Medical physics.

[40]  Heng Li,et al.  Evaluation and mitigation of the interplay effects of intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer in a clinical setting. , 2014, Practical radiation oncology.

[41]  Wei Liu,et al.  A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity‐modulated proton radiotherapy , 2018, Medical physics.

[42]  Paul Keall,et al.  A ROI-based global motion model established on 4DCT and 2D cine-MRI data for MRI-guidance in radiation therapy , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Wei Liu,et al.  Automation of routine elements for spot‐scanning proton patient‐specific quality assurance , 2018, Medical physics.

[45]  Heng Li,et al.  On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer. , 2014, Medical physics.

[46]  Timothy C Y Chan,et al.  Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  A. Lomax,et al.  The dependence of interplay effects on the field scan direction in PBS proton therapy , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  T. Sio,et al.  Early Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Mayo Clinic Experience , 2019, Advances in radiation oncology.

[49]  Wei Liu,et al.  Impact of respiratory motion on worst-case scenario optimized intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancers. , 2015, Practical radiation oncology.

[50]  M. Phillips,et al.  Effects of respiratory motion on dose uniformity with a charged particle scanning method. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  D. Moses,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in lung: a review of its potential for radiotherapy. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[52]  A. Lomax,et al.  4DMRI-based investigation on the interplay effect for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of pancreatic cancer patients , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[53]  Wei Liu,et al.  Mixed integer programming with dose‐volume constraints in intensity‐modulated proton therapy , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[54]  Wei Liu,et al.  An Automatic Approach for Satisfying Dose-Volume Constraints in Linear Fluence Map Optimization for IMPT. , 2014, Journal of cancer therapy.

[55]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Retrospective analysis of artifacts in four-dimensional CT images of 50 abdominal and thoracic radiotherapy patients. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[56]  J. Langendijk,et al.  Comprehensive 4D robustness evaluation for pencil beam scanned proton plans. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[57]  Steven J Frank,et al.  PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. , 2013, Medical physics.

[58]  Wei Liu,et al.  Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers. , 2014, Practical radiation oncology.

[59]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[60]  A C Vásquez,et al.  Comparison of two respiration monitoring systems for 4D imaging with a Siemens CT using a new dynamic breathing phantom , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[61]  Wei Liu,et al.  Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques. , 2012, Medical physics.

[62]  T. Sio,et al.  Small‐spot intensity‐modulated proton therapy and volumetric‐modulated arc therapies for patients with locally advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A dosimetric comparative study , 2018, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[63]  Martin Stuschke,et al.  Potentials of robust intensity modulated scanning proton plans for locally advanced lung cancer in comparison to intensity modulated photon plans. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[64]  Christoph Bert,et al.  Motion compensation with a scanned ion beam: a technical feasibility study , 2008, Radiation oncology.

[65]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity‐modulated proton therapy , 2017, Medical physics.

[66]  Thomas Bortfeld,et al.  Evaluation of Dosimetric Gain and Uncertainties in Proton Therapy Delivery with Scanned Pencil Beam in Treatment of Base-of-skull and Spinal Tumors , 2010 .

[67]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[68]  A J Lomax,et al.  An anthropomorphic breathing phantom of the thorax for testing new motion mitigation techniques for pencil beam scanning proton therapy , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[69]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  A Monte‐Carlo‐based and GPU‐accelerated 4D‐dose calculator for a pencil beam scanning proton therapy system , 2018, Medical physics.

[70]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Comparison of different strategies to use four-dimensional computed tomography in treatment planning for lung cancer patients. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[71]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[72]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  Technical Note: Using experimentally determined proton spot scanning timing parameters to accurately model beam delivery time , 2017, Medical physics.

[73]  Timothy C. Y. Chan,et al.  Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robustness quantification methods comparison in volumetric modulated arc therapy to treat head and neck cancer. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[75]  Antje Knopf,et al.  Mapping motion from 4D-MRI to 3D-CT for use in 4D dose calculations: A technical feasibility study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[76]  S Dowdell,et al.  Interplay effects in proton scanning for lung: a 4D Monte Carlo study assessing the impact of tumor and beam delivery parameters , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[77]  Ye Zhang,et al.  Advanced treatment planning using direct 4D optimisation for pencil-beam scanned particle therapy , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[78]  G. Christensen,et al.  A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. , 2003, Medical physics.

[79]  J. Lambert,et al.  Intrafractional motion during proton beam scanning , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[80]  Wei Liu,et al.  Robust intensity‐modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk , 2017, Medical physics.

[81]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers. , 2013, Medical physics.

[82]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Robust Management of Motion Uncertainty in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2008, Oper. Res..

[83]  T. Sio,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small‐spot intensity‐modulated proton versus volumetric‐modulated arc therapies , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[84]  Albin Fredriksson,et al.  4D robust optimization including uncertainties in time structures can reduce the interplay effect in proton pencil beam scanning radiation therapy , 2018, Medical physics.