An Inhomogeneous Bayesian Texture Model for Spatially Varying Parameter Estimation

In statistical model based texture feature extraction, features based on spatially varying parameters achieve higher discriminative performances compared to spatially constant parameters. In this paper we formulate a novel Bayesian framework which achieves texture characterization by spatially varying parameters based on Gaussian Markov random fields. The parameter estimation is carried out by Metropolis Hasting algorithm. The distributions of estimated spatially varying parameters are then used as successful discriminant texture features in classification and segmentation. Results show that novel features outperform traditional Gaussian Markov random field texture features which use spatially constant parameters. These features capture both pixel spatial dependencies and structural properties of a texture giving improved texture features for effective texture classification and segmentation.

[1]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Image processing - dealing with texture , 2020 .

[2]  Steve R. Gunn,et al.  Snake based unsupervised texture segmentation using Gaussian Markov Random Field Models , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Classification of High Spatial Resolution Imagery Using Improved Gaussian Markov Random-Field-Based Texture Features , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[5]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Texture discrimination with multidimensional distributions of signed gray-level differences , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Sasan Mahmoodi,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation using Active Contours and Local Distributions of Gaussian Markov Random Field Parameters , 2012, BMVC.

[7]  Robert G. Aykroyd,et al.  Bayesian Estimation for Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Gaussian Random Fields , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Classification of textures using Gaussian Markov random fields , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Stan Z. Li Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis , 2009, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[11]  S. K. Nayar,et al.  Multiresolution Histograms and their Use for Texture Classification , 2003 .

[12]  Jana Reinhard,et al.  Textures A Photographic Album For Artists And Designers , 2016 .

[13]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Image Segmentation by Probabilistic Bottom-Up Aggregation and Cue Integration , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Reduced Multidimensional Co-Occurrence Histograms in Texture Classification , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation Using Markov Random Field Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..