Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. METHODS After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider's level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. RESULTS The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider's level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). CONCLUSIONS The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients' anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider's level of experience.

[1]  Lawrence Litt,et al.  Serious Complications Related to Regional Anesthesia: Results of a Prospective Survey in France , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[2]  B. Schelew,et al.  Ankylosing spondylitis and neuraxial anaesthesia — A 10 year review , 1996, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[3]  L. Manchikanti,et al.  A retrospective analysis of failed spinal anesthetic attempts in a community hospital. , 1987, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  I. Kestin,et al.  A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  E. Mascha,et al.  Predicting the difficult neuraxial block: a prospective study. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  J. Langton,et al.  Correlating obstetric epidural anaesthesia performance and psychomotor aptitude , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[7]  R. Sukhani,et al.  Incidence and Etiology of Failed Spinal Anesthetics in a University Hospital: A Prospective Study , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  M. Rossignol,et al.  The performance of spinal anesthesia is marginally more difficult in the elderly. , 1999, Regional anesthesia and pain medicine.

[9]  D. Harrison,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery , 1992, Anaesthesia.

[10]  D. Schroeder,et al.  A Retrospective Review of 4767 Consecutive Spinal Anesthetics: Central Nervous System Complications , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  J. Ghia,et al.  A Retrospective Study of the Incidence and Causes of Failed Spinal Anesthetics in a University Hospital , 1985, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  H. Wulf,et al.  Epidural anaesthesia and spinal haematoma , 1996, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.