False Positive Reduction in CADe Using Diffusing Scale Space

Segmentation is typically the first step in computer-aided-detection (CADe). The second step is false positive reduction which usually involves computing a large number of features with thresholds set by training over excessive data set. The number of false positives can, in principle, be reduced by extensive noise removal and other forms of image enhancement prior to segmentation. However, this can drastically affect the true positive results and their boundaries. We present a post-segmentation method to reduce the number of false positives by using a diffusion scale space. The method is illustrated using Integral Invariant scale space, though this is not a requirement. It is quite general, does not require any prior information, is fast and easy to compute, and gives very encouraging results. Experiments are performed both on intensity mammograms as well as on Volpara® density maps.

[1]  Kevin Woods,et al.  Computer-aided detection for screening mammography , 1999, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[2]  Xavier Lladó,et al.  A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Maria Kallergi,et al.  Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Against the proposition. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  S. Astley,et al.  Computer-aided detection in mammography. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[5]  Michael Brady,et al.  Region Matching in the Temporal Study of Mammograms Using Integral Invariant Scale-Space , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[6]  R A Clark,et al.  False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[7]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Minh-Duc Nguyen,et al.  Feature Extraction and Support Vector Machine Based Classification for False Positive Reduction in Mammographic Images , 2014 .

[9]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust breast composition measurement - Volpara™ , 2010 .

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[11]  Byung-Woo Hong,et al.  Segmentation of mammograms in topographic approach , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Brady,et al.  Shape matching by integral invariants on eccentricity transformed images , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[13]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Integral Invariant Signatures , 2004, ECCV.

[14]  Robert M Nishikawa,et al.  Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  Michael Brady,et al.  Integral invariants for image enhancement , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  R. Rangayyan Biomedical Image Analysis , 2004 .