Tracing the origins of the semantic web

The Semantic Web has been criticized for not being semantic. This article examines the questions of why and how the Web of Data, expressed in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), has come to be known as the Semantic Web. Contrary to previous papers, we deliberately take a descriptive stance and do not start from preconceived ideas about the nature of semantics. Instead, we mainly base our analysis on early design documents of the (Semantic) Web. The main determining factor is shown to be link typing, coupled with the influence of online metadata. Both factors already were present in early web standards and drafts. Our findings indicate that the Semantic Web is directly linked to older artificial intelligence work, despite occasional claims to the contrary. Because of link typing, the Semantic Web can be considered an example of a semantic network. Originally network representations of the meaning of natural language utterances, semantic networks have eventually come to refer to any networks with typed (usually directed) links. We discuss possible causes for this shift and suggest that it may be due to confounding paradigmatic and syntagmatic semantic relations.

[1]  Michael Uschold Where Are the Semantics in the Semantic Web? , 2003, AI Mag..

[2]  Tantek Çelik,et al.  Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web , 2006, WWW '06.

[3]  Gary G. Hendrix,et al.  Expanding the Utility of Semantic Networks Through Partitioning , 1975, IJCAI.

[4]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Missing links: predicting interactions based on a multi-relational network structure with applications in informetrics , 2012 .

[5]  Marko A. Rodriguez,et al.  Exposing multi-relational networks to single-relational network analysis algorithms , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Eric J. Miller An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework. , 1998 .

[7]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[8]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Towards the semantic web: knowledge representation in a dynamic, distributed environment , 2001 .

[9]  Oded Shmueli,et al.  Utilizing the Multiple Facets of WWW Contents , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[10]  Wolfgang G. Stock Concepts and semantic relations in information science , 2010 .

[11]  William A. Woods,et al.  What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1975 .

[12]  Peter Barker,et al.  Kuhn's mature philosophy of science and cognitive psychology , 1996 .

[13]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  The evolution of CycL, the Cyc representation language , 1991, SGAR.

[14]  Piet Kommers,et al.  Concept Mapping , 1997, Springer Texts in Education.

[15]  Stuart C. Shapiro,et al.  SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network , 1986, AAAI.

[16]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Perspective of webometrics , 2004, Scientometrics.

[17]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[18]  R. Doyle The American terrorist. , 2001, Scientific American.

[19]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure , 1995, CACM.

[20]  Karen Spärck Jones What's new about the Semantic Web?: some questions , 2004, SIGF.

[21]  Renato Rocha Souza,et al.  Semantics in the Semantic Web: A Critical Evaluation † , 2011 .