The study of 2D shapes and their similarities is a central problem in the field of vision. It arises in particular from the task of classifying and recognizing objects from their observed silhouette. Defining natural distances between 2D shapes creates a metric space of shapes, whose mathematical structure is inherently relevant to the classification task. One intriguing metric space comes from using conformal mappings of 2D shapes into each other, via the theory of Teichmüller spaces. In this space every simple closed curve in the plane (a “shape”) is represented by a ‘fingerprint’ which is a diffeomorphism of the unit circle to itself (a differentiable and invertible, periodic function). More precisely, every shape defines to a unique equivalence class of such diffeomorphisms up to right multiplication by a Möbius map. The fingerprint does not change if the shape is varied by translations and scaling and any such equivalence class comes from some shape. This coset space, equipped with the infinitesimal Weil-Petersson (WP) Riemannian norm is a metric space. In this space, the shortest path between each two shapes is unique, and is given by a geodesic connecting them. Their distance from each other is given by integrating the WP-norm along that geodesic. In this paper we concentrate on solving the “welding" problem of “sewing" together conformally the interior and exterior of the unit circle, glued on the unit circle by a given diffeomorphism, to obtain the unique 2D shape associated with this diffeomorphism. This will allow us to go back and forth between 2D shapes and their representing diffeomorphisms in this “space of shapes”. We then present an efficient method for computing the unique shortest path, the geodesic of shape morphing between each two end-point shapes. The group of diffeomorphisms of S1 acts as a group of isometries on the space of shapes and we show how this can be used to define shape transformations, like for instance ‘adding a protruding limb’ to any shape.
[1]
Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.
Measurement of Visual Motion
,
1984
.
[2]
U. Grenander,et al.
Structural Image Restoration through Deformable Templates
,
1991
.
[3]
S. Ullman.
Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition
,
1989,
Cognition.
[4]
Alex Pentland,et al.
Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition
,
1995,
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[5]
Daphna Weinshall,et al.
Flexible Syntactic Matching of Curves and Its Application to Automatic Hierarchical Classification of Silhouettes
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[6]
M. Bowick,et al.
The Ricci curvature of Diff S1/SL(2, R)
,
1988
.
[7]
B KimiaBenjamin,et al.
Shapes, shocks, and deformations I
,
1995
.
[8]
A. Yuille.
Deformable Templates for Face Recognition
,
1991,
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9]
Irving Biederman,et al.
Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory
,
1985,
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[10]
Alok Gupta,et al.
Dynamic Programming for Detecting, Tracking, and Matching Deformable Contours
,
1995,
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[11]
David Mumford,et al.
Mathematical theories of shape: do they model perception?
,
1991,
Optics & Photonics.
[12]
A DriscollTobin.
Algorithm 756: a MATLAB toolbox for Schwarz-Christoffel mapping
,
1996
.
[13]
Stefan Carlsson,et al.
Order Structure, Correspondence, and Shape Based Categories
,
1999,
Shape, Contour and Grouping in Computer Vision.
[14]
Ronen Basri,et al.
Determining the similarity of deformable shapes
,
1998,
Vision Research.
[15]
Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.
Snakes: Active contour models
,
2004,
International Journal of Computer Vision.
[16]
Philip N. Klein,et al.
Recognition of Shapes by Editing Shock Graphs
,
2001,
ICCV.