Task-specificity and resource allocation in information perception in three-dimensional space

Modern technologies are more and more capable of presenting information in three-dimensional space instead of being limited to a standard two-dimensional desktop workstation. Thus, it becomes necessary to examine whether display location does have an effect on human information perception and processing. This paper presents two studies concerned with this subject. The first study examined whether optimal display location depends on the task, which is being executed. We found evidence for differences in tasks with different cognitive engagement levels. The second study aimed at a) examining task characteristics in more detail and b) answering the basic question whether it is generally beneficial to present concurrent information in dual-task situations in two instead of one perceptual depth plane in order to optimize resource utilization. Results support the notion of a two-plane benefit.

[1]  Stephen R. Arnott,et al.  Attention switching in depth using random-dot autostereograms: Attention gradient asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Brickenkamp Handbuch psychologischer und pädagogischer Tests , 1975 .

[4]  F. Previc The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Heinz Hügli,et al.  Computing visual attention from scene depth , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[8]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Effects of Interactivity and Spatial Ability on the Comprehension of Spatial Relations in a 3D Computer Visualization , 2004 .

[9]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[10]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Asymmetries of Visuospatial Attention are Modulated by Viewing Distance and Visual Field Elevation: Pseudoneglect in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space , 2000, Cortex.

[11]  William J Horrey,et al.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.