Abundance estimation of long-diving animals using line transect methods.

Line transect sampling is one of the most widely used methods for estimating the size of wild animal populations. An assumption in standard line transect sampling is that all the animals on the trackline are detected without fail. This assumption tends to be violated for marine mammals with surfacing/diving behaviors. The detection probability on the trackline is estimated using duplicate sightings from double-platform line transect methods. The double-platform methods, however, are insufficient to estimate the abundance of long-diving animals because these animals can be completely missed while the observers pass. We developed a more flexible hazard probability model that incorporates information on surfacing/diving patterns obtained from telemetry data. The model is based on a stochastic point process and is statistically tractable. A simulation study showed that the new model provides near-unbiased abundance estimates, whereas the traditional hazard rate and hazard probability models produce considerably biased estimates. As an illustration, we applied the model to data on the Baird's beaked whale (Berardius bairdii) in the western North Pacific.

[1]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A combination line transect and capture-recapture sampling model for multiple observers in aerial surveys , 1996, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[2]  S. Buckland.  Perpendicular distance models for line transect sampling. , 1985, Biometrics.

[3]  T. Schweder,et al.  Hazard Models for Line Transect Surveys with Independent Observers , 1999, Biometrics.

[4]  T. Kasuya.  Japanese Whaling and Other Cetacean Fisheries (10 pp) , 2007 .

[5]  D. Palka,et al.  Abundance and densities of beaked and bottlenose whales (family Ziphiidae) , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[6]  Toshihide Kitakado,et al.  Effect of surfacing patterns on abundance estimates of long-diving animals , 2009, Fisheries Science.

[7]  H. Skaug.  Markov Modulated Poisson Processes for Clustered Line Transect Data , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[8]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Double‐Observer Line Transect Methods: Levels of Independence , 2010, Biometrics.

[9]  Len Thomas,et al.  Estimating the Encounter Rate Variance in Distance Sampling , 2009, Biometrics.

[10]  Hiroshi Okamura,et al.  A line transect method to estimate abundance of long‐diving animals , 2003 .

[11]  T. Schweder,et al.  Simulated Likelihood Methods for Complex Double‐Platform Line Transect Surveys , 1999, Biometrics.

[12]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Horvitz-Thompson Estimators for Double-Platform Line Transect Surveys , 1998 .

[13]  Toshiya Kishiro,et al.  Diving behaviour of a Baird’s beaked whale, Berardius bairdii, in the slope water region of the western North Pacific: first dive records using a data logger , 2007 .

[14]  Toshihide Kitakado,et al.  Abundance Estimation of Diving Animals by the Double‐Platform Line Transect Method , 2003, Biometrics.

[15]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Incorporating Covariates into Standard Line Transect Analyses , 2003, Biometrics.

[16]  H. Marsh,et al.  Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna , 1989 .

[17]  John Calambokidis,et al.  Probability of Detecting Harbor Porpoise from Aerial Surveys: Estimating g(0) , 1997 .