THE HANFORD THYROID DISEASE STUDY: AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF THE FINDINGS

The Hanford Thyroid Disease Study (HTDS) is one of the largest and most complex epidemiologic studies of the relation between environmental exposures to 131I and thyroid disease. The study detected no dose-response relation using a 0.05 level for statistical significance. The results for thyroid cancer appear inconsistent with those from other studies of populations with similar exposures, and either reflect inadequate statistical power, bias, or unique relations between exposure and disease risk. In this paper, we explore these possibilities, and present evidence that the HTDS statistical power was inadequate due to complex uncertainties associated with the mathematical models and assumptions used to reconstruct individual doses. We conclude that, at the very least, the confidence intervals reported by the HTDS for thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases are too narrow because they fail to reflect key uncertainties in the measurement-error structure. We recommend that the HTDS results be interpreted as inconclusive rather than as evidence for little or no disease risk from Hanford exposures.

[1]  A. I. Apostoaei.  TESTING PREDICTION CAPABILITIES OF AN 131I TERRESTRIAL TRANSPORT MODEL BY USING MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED AT THE HANFORD NUCLEAR FACILITY , 2005, Health physics.

[2]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  2004 Update of Dosimetry for the Utah Thyroid Cohort Study , 2006, Radiation research.

[3]  V. V. Markov,et al.  A cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases after the chornobyl accident: thyroid cancer in Ukraine detected during first screening. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[5]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Multiple‐bias modelling for analysis of observational data , 2005 .

[6]  B. A. Napier,et al.  Parameters used in the environmental pathways and radiological dose modules (DESCARTES, CIDER, and CRD codes) of the Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Integrated Codes (HEDRIC) , 1994 .

[7]  K. Kopecky,et al.  Childhood Thyroid Cancer, Radiation Dose from Chernobyl, and Dose Uncertainties in Bryansk Oblast, Russia: A Population-Based Case-Control Study , 2006, Radiation research.

[8]  R. Shore,et al.  Issues and epidemiological evidence regarding radiation-induced thyroid cancer. , 1992, Radiation research.

[9]  Nations United.  sources and effects of ionizing radiation , 2000 .

[10]  Raymond J Carroll,et al.  A Reanalysis of Thyroid Neoplasms in the Israeli Tinea Capitis Study Accounting for Dose Uncertainties , 2004, Radiation research.

[11]  A. Wallgren,et al.  Cancer incidence after radiotherapy for skin haemangioma during infancy. , 1995, Acta oncologica.

[12]  T. Hakulinen,et al.  Breast cancer after radiotherapy for skin hemangioma in infancy. , 1994, Radiation research.

[13]  T. Hakulinen,et al.  Thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for skin hemangioma in infancy. , 1994, Radiation research.

[14]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition , 1986 .

[15]  R. Tarone,et al.  Thyroid cancer rates and 131I doses from Nevada atmospheric nuclear bomb tests. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Thyroid Disease Associated With Exposure to the Nevada Nuclear Weapons Test Site Radiation: A Reevaluation Based on Corrected Dosimetry and Examination Data , 2006, Epidemiology.

[17]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[18]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[19]  Daniel O Stram,et al.  Power and Uncertainty Analysis of Epidemiological Studies of Radiation-Related Disease Risk in which Dose Estimates are Based on a Complex Dosimetry System: Some Observations , 2003, Radiation research.

[20]  Ethel S Gilbert,et al.  Some Statistical Implications of Dose Uncertainty in Radiation Dose–Response Analyses , 2006, Radiation research.

[21]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  INDIVIDUAL THYROID DOSE ESTIMATES FOR A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CHERNOBYL-RELATED THYROID CANCER AMONG CHILDREN OF BELARUS—PART II. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM LONG-LIVED RADIONUCLIDES AND EXTERNAL RADIATION , 2006, Health physics.

[22]  F. O. Hoffman.  Peer review of HEDR uncertainty and sensitivity analyses plan , 1993 .

[23]  W. Heidenreich,et al.  Childhood exposure due to the Chernobyl accident and thyroid cancer risk in contaminated areas of Belarus and Russia , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  Scott Davis,et al.  Thyroid neoplasia, autoimmune thyroiditis, and hypothyroidism in persons exposed to iodine 131 from the hanford nuclear site. , 2004, JAMA.

[25]  J H Lubin,et al.  Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. , 1995, Radiation research.

[26]  K. Kopecky,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THYROID RADIATION DOSES FOR THE HANFORD THYROID DISEASE STUDY: RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL POWER OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSES , 2004, Health physics.

[27]  S C Darby,et al.  Some aspects of measurement error in explanatory variables for continuous and binary regression models. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Risk of thyroid cancer after exposure to 131I in childhood. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987. , 1994, Radiation research.

[30]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Semiparametric Regression Modeling with Mixtures of Berkson and Classical Error, with Application to Fallout from the Nevada Test Site , 2002, Biometrics.

[31]  William J Blot,et al.  CANCER MORTALITY AMONG POPULATIONS RESIDING IN COUNTIES NEAR THE HANFORD SITE, 1950–2000 , 2006, Health physics.

[32]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  INDIVIDUAL THYROID DOSE ESTIMATION FOR A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CHERNOBYL-RELATED THYROID CANCER AMONG CHILDREN OF BELARUS—PART I: 131I, SHORT-LIVED RADIOIODINES (132I, 133I, 135I), AND SHORT-LIVED RADIOTELLURIUMS (131MTe AND 132Te) , 2004, Health physics.

[33]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part IV: Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality. , 1994, Radiation research.

[34]  R. D. Lloyd,et al.  A cohort study of thyroid disease in relation to fallout from nuclear weapons testing. , 1993, JAMA.

[35]  C. M. Heeb,et al.  Radionuclide releases to the Columbia River from Hanford Operations, 1944--1971. Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project , 1994 .

[36]  K. Kopecky,et al.  Iodine deficiency, radiation dose, and the risk of thyroid cancer among children and adolescents in the Bryansk region of Russia following the Chernobyl power station accident. , 2003, International Journal of Epidemiology.