Extraction of the relevant population from a forensic database.

Evaluation of forensic evidence using Bayesian statistics requires the formulation of hypotheses. Many hypotheses, especially those presenting the defence viewpoint imply that traces can be attributed to an arbitrary member of a relevant population. The exact items or persons that comprise the relevant population may vary from case to case. Therefore, the statistical evaluation of evidential value based on databases cannot make use of a fixed set of items or persons. In the current paper, methodology is presented to filter the contents of a database such that only items that are considered relevant are selected. Six scenarios, including those related to fibre, textile, and glass evidence are described, together with the hypotheses and relevant populations that may be evaluated by an expert. In addition, we show how items representing the defined relevant population can be extracted from a database using SQL code. Images of the items in the (filtered) relevant population provide an overview of the selected items and hence direct feedback to the examiner. In this way, erroneous codes or unwanted side effects can be identified and corrected. It is concluded that the filtering procedure is effective in cases where the relevant population is demarcated accurately.

[1]  A. Biedermann,et al.  The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[2]  I. Evett,et al.  A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework , 1998 .

[3]  Vincent Hughes,et al.  Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice. , 2018, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[4]  T. Biermann Blocks of colour IV: the evidential value of blue and red cotton fibres. , 2007, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[5]  T. Biermann,et al.  The evidential value of black cotton fibres. , 2001, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[6]  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison,et al.  Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  D. Balding,et al.  Choice of population database for forensic DNA profile analysis , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[8]  Christopher P. Saunders,et al.  Building a unified statistical framework for the forensic identification of source problems , 2018 .

[9]  Jaap van der Weerd,et al.  TraceBase; A database structure for forensic trace analysis. , 2021, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[10]  C Champod,et al.  Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fibre transfer evidence. , 1997, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[11]  Ivo Alberink,et al.  Implementation and assessment of a likelihood ratio approach for the evaluation of LA-ICP-MS evidence in forensic glass analysis. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  R W May,et al.  An evaluation of common methods of paint analysis. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[13]  Daniel Ramos,et al.  The use of LA-ICP-MS databases to calculate likelihood ratios for the forensic analysis of glass evidence. , 2018, Talanta.

[14]  C Champod,et al.  Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions. , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[15]  R. Koons,et al.  The Forensic Significance of Glass Composition and Refractive Index Measurements , 1999 .

[16]  Jaap van der Weerd,et al.  Towards source level evaluation of the evidential value of fibre examinations. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[17]  David H. Kaye Logical Relevance: Problems with the Reference Population and DNA Mixtures in People v. Pizarro , 2004 .

[18]  I. Evett,et al.  Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[19]  John Coumbaros,et al.  Enhancing the evidential value of textile fibres: Part 1: Development of a spectral database and evaluative comparison strategy. , 2018, Forensic science international.

[20]  Grzegorz Zadora,et al.  The evaluation of evidence for microspectrophotometry data using functional data analysis. , 2019, Forensic science international.