Efficacy of a Hybrid Upper Limb Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System in Lessening Selected Impairments and Dysfunctions Consequent to Cerebral Damage

Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a new computerized neu romuscular electric stimulation system (Handmaster™) in improving selected im pairments and functional measures of patients who survived stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Survivors of stroke (n = 13) and TBI (n = 7) with chronic paralysis lasting 6.8 ± 7.8 years (range 1 to 29 years) participated in a home program of elec trical stimulation. The device is a hybrid of a hand-forearm splint that incorporates five surface electrodes and a computerized electrical stimulator. The patterned stimu lation elicits finger flexion and extension, lateral pinch, and grasp of the paralyzed hand. Patients practiced daily for 3.4 ± 0.5 hours over a mean duration of 13.1 ± 6.6 weeks. Assessment included goniometric measurements of wrist and elbow rest ing posture, passive and active joints motion, linear distance of fingers to palm, Ash worth scale, and the ability to hold a 1 kg load in the affected hand. The Frenchay arm test represented hand function. Results : ANOVA tests and Wilcoxon signed rank test were employed. There were significant improvements (p = 0.01) in elbow, wrist, and fingers posture; Ash worth scale; volitional active elbow flexion (32.5 ± 12.7°); wrist extension (12.7 ± 11.1°) and flexion (9.03 ± 4.5°). Passive wrist extension improved 13.7 ± 3.6°. Thir teen patients (65 percent) had active wrist extension post stimulation compared with only three (15 percent) before study commencement. Partial completion of the Fren chay tasks were observed before stimulation in only three patients compared with partial completion of tasks by nine patients at study conclusion. Post stimulation, 16 of 20 patients were able to hold a 1 kg weight with the NESS system active, com pared with only three patients without it. Conclusions: Application of the NESS system for three to four hours daily im proves selected impairments and may help to restore partial hand functions of patients with chronic stroke or head injury. Key Words: Chronic—Stroke—Brain injury— Electrical stimulation—Motor recovery.

[1]  P. Bach-y-Rita.  Brain Plasticity as a Basis of Sensory Substitution , 1987 .

[2]  M. Limburg,et al.  The Frenchay Activities Index: Assessment of Functional Status in Stroke Patients , 1993, Stroke.

[3]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  D. Wade,et al.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. , 1986, International rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  R. Waters,et al.  Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[7]  M. E. Smith,et al.  Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. , 1982, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Asplund,et al.  A non-intensive stroke unit reduces functional disability and the need for long-term hospitalization. , 1985, Stroke.

[9]  M. Rusin.  Stroke rehabilitation: a geropsychological perspective. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Merletti,et al.  A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. , 1978, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  P. Burney,et al.  Predicting the Disability of First‐Time Stroke Sufferers at 1 Year: 12‐Month Follow‐up of a Population‐Based Cohort in Southeast England , 1994, Stroke.

[12]  N. Miller,et al.  An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  R. M. Glaser,et al.  The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  L. Baker,et al.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the muscles surrounding the shoulder. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[15]  A K Williams,et al.  Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: changes in functional performance. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  L. Kalra,et al.  Medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. , 1995, Stroke.

[17]  R. Culbertson,et al.  Comparison of Two Systems for Stroke Rehabilitation in a General Hospital , 1976, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Mary Elizabeth Parker,et al.  Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1995 .

[20]  G. Kraft,et al.  Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  R. Waters,et al.  Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for hemiplegic patients. , 1979, Physical therapy.

[22]  J. Williams,et al.  Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. , 1990, Stroke.

[23]  B. Dobkin,et al.  The economic impact of stroke. , 1995, Neurology.

[24]  C. Galloway.  Agonist and Antagonist Activity During Voluntary Upper-Limb Movement in Patients with Stroke , 1994 .

[25]  S L Wolf,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[26]  R. Fields,et al.  Electromyographically triggered electric muscle stimulation for chronic hemiplegia. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  W S Pease,et al.  Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[29]  M. Reding,et al.  Focused stroke rehabilitation programs improve outcome. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[30]  K J Ottenbacher,et al.  The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[31]  I. Holme,et al.  Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial. , 1991, Stroke.

[32]  L. Baker,et al.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the head-injured patient. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[33]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. , 1996, Stroke.

[34]  V. Alfieri.  Electrical treatment of spasticity. Reflex tonic activity in hemiplegic patients and selected specific electrostimulation. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.