Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study

Background— Sirolimus-eluting stents have been reported to be effective in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Still, it has not been fully clarified which strategy would provide the best results with true bifurcation lesions. Methods and Results— The CACTUS trial (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing 2 different techniques of stenting, with mandatory final kissing-balloon inflation, in true bifurcations: (1) elective “crush” stenting and (2) stenting of only the main branch, with provisional side-branch T-stenting. From August 2004 to June 2007, 350 patients were enrolled in 12 European centers. The primary angiographic end point was the in-segment restenosis rate, and the primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization) at 6 months. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were not different between the crush group (4.6% and 13.2% in the main branch and side branch, respectively) and the provisional stenting group (6.7% and 14.7% in the main branch and side branch, respectively; P=NS). Additional stenting on the side branch in the provisional stenting group was required in 31% of lesions. Rates of major adverse cardiac events were also similar in the 2 groups (15.8% in the crush group versus 15% in the provisional stenting group, P=NS). Conclusions— In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.

[1]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study , 2006, Circulation.

[2]  Alfonso Medina,et al.  Una clasificación simple de las lesiones coronarias en bifurcación , 2006 .

[3]  John A Ormiston,et al.  The "crush" technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insights from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployments. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  The clinical outcome of percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in multivessel coronary artery disease with the sirolimus-eluting stent: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II). , 2007, European heart journal.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  T A Bass,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation coronary disease. , 2007, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[9]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Randomized Study to Evaluate Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Implanted at Coronary Bifurcation Lesions , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  E. Currie,et al.  Drug‐eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: Insights into the crush technique , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[12]  A. Colombo,et al.  Predictors of restenosis after treatment of bifurcational lesions with paclitaxel eluting stents: A multicenter prospective registry of 150 consecutive patients , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  K. Detre,et al.  Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  M. Pan,et al.  Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. , 2004, American heart journal.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  J. Suárez de Lezo,et al.  [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. , 2006, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[18]  J. Tobis,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent--immediate and follow-up results. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Colombo Bifurcational lesions and the “crush” technique: Understanding why it works and why it doesn't—a kiss is not just a kiss , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Mooney,et al.  Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  C. Di Mario,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Modified T-Stenting Technique With Crushing for Bifurcation Lesions: Immediate Results and 30-Day Outcome , 2003 .

[23]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Immediate and long-term results of "T" stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  Young‐Bae Park,et al.  Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.