A Novel Technique for Treatment of Metaphyseal Voids in Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients

Background and Objectives: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is challenging, with reported high complication rates mostly related to implant failure involving screw cut-out and penetration. Metaphyseal defects are common in osteoporotic bone and weaken the osteosynthesis construct. A novel technique for augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was developed for the treatment of patients in advanced age with complex proximal humerus fractures and metaphyseal voids, whereby the cement was allowed to partially cure for 5–7 min after mixing to achieve medium viscosity, and then it was manually placed into the defect through the traumatic lateral window with a volume of 4–6 mL per patient. The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess this technique versus autologous bone graft augmentation and no augmentation. Materials and Methods: The outcomes of 120 patients with plated Neer three- and four-part fractures, assigned to groups of 63 cases with no augmentation, 28 with bone graft augmentation and 29 with cement augmentation, were assessed in this study. DASH, CS, pain scores and range of motion were analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed with factors for treatment and age groups, Neer fracture types and follow-up periods, and with the consideration of age as a covariate. Results: DASH and CS improved following cement augmentation at three and six months compared to bone grafting, being significant when correcting for age as a covariate (p ≤ 0.007). While the age group had a significant effect on both these scores with worsened values at a higher age for non-augmented and grafted patients (p ≤ 0.044), this was not the case for cement augmented patients (p ≥ 0.128). Cement augmentation demonstrated good clinical results at 12 months with a mean DASH of 10.21 and mean CS percentage of 84.83% versus the contralateral side, not being significantly different among the techniques (p ≥ 0.372), despite the cement augmented group representing the older population with more four-part fractures. There were no concerning adverse events specifically related to the novel technique. Conclusions: This study has detailed a novel technique for the treatment of metaphyseal defects with PMMA cement augmentation in elderly patients with complex proximal humerus fractures and follow-up to one year, whereby the cement was allowed to partially cure to achieve medium viscosity, and then it was manually placed into the defect through the traumatic lateral window. The results demonstrate clinically equivalent short-term results to 6 months compared to augmentation with bone graft or no augmentation—despite the patient group being older and with a higher rate of more severe fracture patterns. The technique appears to be safe with no specifically related adverse events and can be added in the surgeon’s armamentarium for the treatment of these difficult to manage fractures.

[1]  Maria Luisa Ruspi,et al.  Reconstruction of proximal humeral fractures without screws using a reinforced bone substitute. , 2020, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  T. Murase,et al.  Bone Resorption of the Greater Tuberosity after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Following Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures: Fragment Characteristics and Intraoperative Risk Factors. , 2020, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  A. Ignatius,et al.  Biological and mechanical performance and degradation characteristics of calcium phosphate cements in large animals and humans. , 2020, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  Jason A Inzana,et al.  Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling , 2020, Bone & joint research.

[5]  Do-Young Kim,et al.  PHILOS plate fixation with polymethyl methacrylate cement augmentation of an osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture , 2020, Clinics in shoulder and elbow.

[6]  A. Capone,et al.  Synthetic Bone Substitutes and Mechanical Devices for the Augmentation of Osteoporotic Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies , 2020, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[7]  Kaitlyn N Christmas,et al.  Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty. , 2020, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Late screw-related complications in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review. , 2019, Injury.

[9]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Complications after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly-an analysis of complication patterns and risk factors for reverse shoulder arthroplasty and angular-stable plating. , 2019, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  W. Böcker,et al.  Augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of current biomechanical and clinical studies , 2019, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  J. Franke,et al.  Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system in elderly patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial , 2019, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  C. Spross,et al.  How bone quality may influence intraoperative and early postoperative problems after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. , 2017, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  M. Schnetzke,et al.  Quality of Reduction Influences Outcome After Locked-Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Type-C Fractures. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  C. Fialka,et al.  Risk factors for humeral head necrosis and non-union after plating in proximal humeral fractures. , 2016, Injury.

[15]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Histomorphometric Assessment of Cancellous and Cortical Bone Material Distribution in the Proximal Humerus of Normal and Osteoporotic Individuals , 2015, Medicine.

[16]  C. Spross,et al.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Humerus , 2015, JBJS essential surgical techniques.

[17]  W. Wallace,et al.  Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty. , 2015, World journal of orthopedics.

[18]  J. Goldhahn,et al.  The Influence of Local Bone Density on the Outcome of One Hundred and Fifty Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Locking Plate. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  H. Hoogewoud,et al.  A prospective study of percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement in traumatic vertebral fractures: 10-year results , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[20]  M. Windolf,et al.  In vitro temperature evaluation during cement augmentation of proximal humerus plate screw tips. , 2013, Injury.

[21]  F. Gebhard,et al.  Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. , 2013, Injury.

[22]  H. Mullett,et al.  Effect of Calcium Triphosphate Cement on Proximal Humeral Fracture Osteosynthesis: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[23]  A. Prescher,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Augmented With Calcium Phosphate Cement , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[24]  K. Somasundaram,et al.  Proximal humeral fractures: the role of calcium sulphate augmentation and extended deltoid splitting approach in internal fixation using locking plates. , 2013, Injury.

[25]  M. Blauth,et al.  The effect of in situ augmentation on implant anchorage in proximal humeral head fractures. , 2012, Injury.

[26]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  Fracture site augmentation with calcium phosphate cement reduces screw penetration after open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[27]  C. Kammerlander,et al.  Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. , 2011, Injury.

[28]  B. Feeley,et al.  A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. , 2011, Injury.

[29]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  David Limb,et al.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[31]  D. Regge,et al.  Temperature Measurement During Polymerization of Bone Cement in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: An In Vivo Study in Humans , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[32]  Laurent Audigé,et al.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures Using a Proximal Humeral Locked Plate: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[33]  G. Paiement,et al.  Locked Plating of 3- and 4-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Patients: The Effect of Initial Fracture Pattern on Outcome , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[34]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: A Systematic Review of 69 Clinical Studies , 2006, Spine.

[35]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[36]  R. Page,et al.  Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  T. Oxland,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Humeral Fracture Fixation Supplemented with Calcium Phosphate Cement , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.