A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots

As social robots become more common, there is a need to understand how people perceive and interact with such technology. This systematic review seeks to estimate people’s attitudes toward, trust in, anxiety associated with, and acceptance of social robots; as well as factors that are associated with these beliefs. Ninety-seven studies were identified with a combined sample of over 13,000 participants and a standardized score was computed for each in order to represent the valence (positive, negative, or neutral) and magnitude (on a scale from 1 to − 1) of people’s beliefs about robots. Potential moderating factors such as the robots’ domain of application and design, the type of exposure to the robot, and the characteristics of potential users were also investigated. The findings suggest that people generally have positive attitudes towards social robots and are willing to interact with them. This finding may challenge some of the existing doubt surrounding the adoption of robotics in social domains of application but more research is needed to fully understand the factors that influence attitudes.

[1]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Robot's Impression of Appearance and Their Trustworthy and Emotion Richness , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  Increasing trust in human–robot medical interactions: effects of transparency and adaptability , 2018, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[3]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Elena Torta,et al.  Attitudes towards socially assistive robots in intelligent homes , 2013, HRI 2013.

[5]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Comparing a humanoid tutor to a human tutor delivering an instructional task to children , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[7]  Wolfgang Minker,et al.  Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Trust and Likability in Spoken Human-Robot Interaction , 2018, LREC.

[8]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2014, ICSR.

[10]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Simulation and Its Discontents , 2009 .

[11]  A. Chan,et al.  A review of technology acceptance by older adults , 2011 .

[12]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[13]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Exploring influences of robot anxiety into HRI , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[15]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Fault Justification in Human-Robot Trust , 2018, AAMAS.

[16]  T. Rantanen,et al.  Care Personnel's Attitudes and Fears Toward Care Robots in Elderly Care: A Comparison of Data from the Care Personnel in Finland and Japan. , 2018, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[17]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: from hypothesis to integrated theory. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[18]  Willem F. G. Haselager,et al.  Do Robot Performance and Behavioral Style a ↵ ect Human Trust ? A Multi-Method Approach , 2014 .

[19]  Ana Paiva,et al.  The Power of a Hand-shake in Human-Robot Interactions , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[20]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[21]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  The relation between people's attitude and anxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[22]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Older Adults' Perceptions of Supporting Factors of Trust in a Robot Care Provider , 2018, J. Robotics.

[23]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  The effect of group size on people's attitudes and cooperative behaviors toward robots in interactive gameplay , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[24]  T. Rantanen,et al.  Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel – a comparison of two approaches , 2018, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Serkan Erebak,et al.  Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Views from Within a Narrative: Evaluating Long-Term Human–Robot Interaction in a Naturalistic Environment Using Open-Ended Scenarios , 2014, Cognitive Computation.

[28]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[29]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults , 2009, HCI.

[30]  Angel P. del Pobil,et al.  An Acceptance Model for Service Robots in Global Markets , 2012, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[31]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  Robots in Education and Care of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Study on Acceptance by Experienced and Future Professionals , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[32]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  What are people's associations of domestic robots?: Comparing implicit and explicit measures , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[33]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[34]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  LiangYuhua,et al.  Advancing the Strategic Messages Affecting Robot Trust Effect: The Dynamic of User- and Robot-Generated Content on Human–Robot Trust and Interaction Outcomes , 2016 .

[36]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot? Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[38]  B. MacDonald,et al.  Attitudes towards health‐care robots in a retirement village , 2012, Australasian journal on ageing.

[39]  Fabrizio Lamberti,et al.  Human-Robot Interfaces for Interactive Receptionist Systems and Wayfinding Applications , 2018, Robotics.

[40]  Bradley Hayes,et al.  Robotic assistance in the coordination of patient care , 2018, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[41]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Learning with Educational Companion Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application Potentials for Education Robots , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[42]  David Robert,et al.  Children's Openness to Interacting with a Robot Scale (COIRS) , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[43]  S. Breckler Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  The intention–behaviour gap in technology usage: the moderating role of attitude strength , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  I Trained this robot: The impact of pre-experience and execution behavior on robot teachers , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[46]  T. Ostrom The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. , 1969 .

[47]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Jaeryoung Lee,et al.  I am a warm robot: the effects of temperature in physical human–robot interaction , 2013, Robotica.

[49]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  The mental simulation of a human-robot interaction: Positive effects on attitudes and anxiety toward robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[50]  Markus Appel,et al.  Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[52]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward , 2006 .

[53]  Elizabeth Broadbent,et al.  Benefits and problems of health‐care robots in aged care settings: A comparison trial , 2016, Australasian journal on ageing.

[54]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[55]  Nikolaos Mavridis,et al.  Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[56]  Donghee Don Shin,et al.  Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction , 2011 .

[57]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[58]  T. Pettigrew Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  Somaya Ben Allouch,et al.  Acceptance and use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[60]  R. Petty,et al.  Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1994 .

[61]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  The effect of employing humanoid robots for teaching English on students' anxiety and attitude , 2014, 2014 Second RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM).

[62]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[63]  Eunil Park,et al.  The adoption of teaching assistant robots: a technology acceptance model approach , 2016, Program.

[64]  Myounghoon Jeon,et al.  Both “look and feel” matter: Essential factors for robotic companionship , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[65]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[66]  Carsten Zoll,et al.  The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[67]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009 .

[68]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Don’t Stare at Me: The Impact of a Humanoid Robot’s Gaze upon Trust During a Cooperative Human–Robot Visual Task , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[69]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[70]  Kerstin Sophie Haring,et al.  Perception of a humanoid robot: A cross-cultural comparison , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[71]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  A methodological variation for acceptance evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in public places , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[72]  Tony J. Prescott,et al.  Robots are not just tools , 2017, Connect. Sci..

[73]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  How people perceive different robot types: A direct comparison of an android, humanoid, and non-biomimetic robot , 2016, 2016 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST).

[74]  Tuuli Turja,et al.  Social Acceptance of Robots in Different Occupational Fields: A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[75]  Karl-H. Ebel The impact of industrial robots on the world of work , 1987, Robotics.

[76]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  The effects of robot facial emotional expressions and gender on child–robot interaction in a field study , 2018, Connect. Sci..

[77]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Influences of experiences of robots into Negative Attitudes toward Robots , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[78]  Fang-Wu Tung,et al.  Child Perception of Humanoid Robot Appearance and Behavior , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[79]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots , 2007 .

[80]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Attitudes, Prior Interaction, and Petitioner Credibility Predict Support for Considering the Rights of Robots , 2018, HRI.

[81]  Birgit Lugrin,et al.  Social Robots as a Means of Integration? an Explorative Acceptance Study considering Gender and Non-verbal Behaviour , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[82]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[83]  Tracy Sanders,et al.  Social Conformity Effects on Trust in Simulation-Based Human-Robot Interaction , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[84]  Taezoon Park,et al.  When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[85]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[86]  Claudio Germak,et al.  Reframing HRI Design Opportunities for Social Robots: Lessons Learnt from a Service Robotics Case Study Approach Using UX for HRI , 2018, Future Internet.

[87]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[88]  R. Sickles,et al.  An International Comparison of Technology Adoption and Efficiency: A Dynamic Panel Model , 1999 .

[89]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Robot humor: How self-irony and Schadenfreude influence people's rating of robot likability , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[90]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[91]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[92]  Toni Ferro,et al.  Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[93]  Min-Gyu Kim,et al.  Effectiveness of robot exhibition through visitors experience: A case study of Nagoya Science Hiroba exhibition in Japan , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS).

[94]  A. Rigaud,et al.  Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting , 2014, Clinical interventions in aging.

[95]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets? , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[96]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[97]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Dance Step Estimation Method Based on HMM for Dance Partner Robot , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[98]  Mary-Anne Williams,et al.  Do You Trust Me, Blindly? Factors Influencing Trust Towards a Robot Recommender System , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[99]  Jasmin Bernotat,et al.  Can(‘t) Wait to Have a Robot at Home? - Japanese and German Users' Attitudes Toward Service Robots in Smart Homes , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[100]  Jianqiang Yi,et al.  Robot Planning with Artificial Potential Field Guided Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm , 2006, ICNC.

[101]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  Understanding Social Robots , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[102]  Raul Hakli,et al.  Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[103]  Il Im,et al.  An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[104]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[105]  J. Dinet,et al.  Exploratory investigation of attitudes towards assistive robots for future users , 2014 .

[106]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Survey of Factors for the Prediction of Human Comfort with a Non-anthropomorphic Robot in Public Spaces , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[107]  Alex Barco,et al.  Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review , 2019, BMJ Paediatrics Open.

[108]  Maya Cakmak,et al.  Comfort and Attitudes Towards Robots Among Young, Middle‐Aged, and Older Adults: A Cross‐Sectional Study , 2018, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[109]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[110]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[111]  Deborah W. Hamby,et al.  Parents' Judgments of the Acceptability and Importance of Socially Interactive Robots for Intervening with Young Children with Disabilities , 2013 .

[112]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Can You Trust Your Robot? , 2011 .

[113]  Elena Torta,et al.  Evaluation of a Small Socially-Assistive Humanoid Robot in Intelligent Homes for the Care of the Elderly , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[114]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[115]  Sakari,et al.  Social Service Robots in Wellness and Restaurant Applications , 2013 .

[116]  Tatsuya Nomura Cultural differences in social acceptance of robots , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[117]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Improving attitudes towards social robots using imagined contact , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[118]  Dylan F. Glas,et al.  Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[119]  Lisa Wise,et al.  Physiotherapists' Acceptance of a Socially Assistive Robot in Ongoing Clinical Deployment , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[120]  Aneil Mishra,et al.  Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[121]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[122]  Mohamed Chetouani,et al.  Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[123]  G. Nejat,et al.  Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults , 2014, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[124]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[125]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Playing catch with robots: Incorporating social gestures into physical interactions , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[126]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Measurement of Anxiety toward Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.