Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.

PURPOSE To develop and implement a fully automated approach to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning. METHOD The optimization algorithm is developed based on a hierarchical constrained optimization technique and is referred internally at our institution as expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO). Beamlet contributions to regions-of-interest are precomputed and captured in the influence matrix. Planning goals are of two classes: hard constraints that are strictly enforced from the first step (e.g., maximum dose to spinal cord), and desirable goals that are sequentially introduced in three constrained optimization problems (better planning target volume (PTV) coverage, lower organ at risk (OAR) doses, and smoother fluence map). After solving the optimization problems using external commercial optimization engines, the optimal fluence map is imported into an FDA-approved treatment planning system (TPS) for leaf sequencing and accurate full dose calculation. The dose-discrepancy between the optimization and TPS dose calculation is then calculated and incorporated into optimization by a novel dose correction loop technique using Lagrange multipliers. The correction loop incorporates the leaf sequencing and scattering effects into optimization to improve the plan quality and reduce the calculation time. The resultant optimal fluence map is again imported into TPS for leaf sequencing and final dose calculation for plan evaluation and delivery. The workflow is automated using application program interface (API) scripting, requiring user interaction solely to prepare the contours and beam arrangement prior to launching the ECHO plug-in from the TPS. For each site, parameters and objective functions are chosen to represent clinical priorities. The first site chosen for clinical implementation was metastatic paraspinal lesions treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). As a first step, 75 ECHO paraspinal plans were generated retrospectively and compared with clinically treated plans generated by planners using VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) with 4 to 6 partial arcs. Subsequently, clinical deployment began in April, 2017. RESULTS In retrospective study, ECHO plans were found to be dosimetrically superior with respect to tumor coverage, plan conformity, and OAR sparing. For example, the average PTV D95%, cord and esophagus max doses, and Paddick Conformity Index were improved, respectively, by 1%, 6%, 14%, and 15%, at a negligible 3% cost of the average skin D10cc dose. CONCLUSION Hierarchical constrained optimization is a powerful and flexible tool for automated IMRT treatment planning. The dosimetric correction step accurately accounts for detailed dosimetric multileaf collimator and scattering effects. The system produces high-quality, Pareto optimal plans and avoids the time-consuming trial-and-error planning process.

[1]  P. Storchi,et al.  The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  A L Boyer,et al.  Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Xun Jia,et al.  A DVH-guided IMRT optimization algorithm for automatic treatment planning and adaptive radiotherapy replanning. , 2014, Medical physics.

[4]  David Craft,et al.  How many plans are needed in an IMRT multi-objective plan database? , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  W. R. Lee,et al.  Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer. , 2011 .

[6]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  IMRT treatment planning based on prioritizing prescription goals , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  P. Levendag,et al.  Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Sean L Berry,et al.  Use of a constrained hierarchical optimization dataset enhances knowledge‐based planning as a quality assurance tool for prostate bed irradiation , 2018, Medical physics.

[9]  Lei Xing,et al.  Development of an autonomous treatment planning strategy for radiation therapy with effective use of population‐based prior data , 2017, Medical physics.

[10]  M. Alber,et al.  Tools for the analysis of dose optimization: II. Sensitivity analysis , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Timothy C Y Chan,et al.  Predicting objective function weights from patient anatomy in prostate IMRT treatment planning. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  J O Deasy,et al.  IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer using prioritized prescription optimization and mean-tail-dose functions. , 2008, Linear algebra and its applications.

[15]  Lei Xing,et al.  Simultaneous beam sampling and aperture shape optimization for SPORT. , 2015, Medical physics.

[16]  Volker Steil,et al.  Fully automated, multi-criterial planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - An international multi-center validation for prostate cancer. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Marita Falkinger,et al.  Prioritized optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[18]  Ke Sheng,et al.  4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located or larger lung tumors. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P. Voet,et al.  Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  M Monz,et al.  Pareto navigation—algorithmic foundation of interactive multi-criteria IMRT planning , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  R. Mohan,et al.  Reducing dose calculation time for accurate iterative IMRT planning. , 2002, Medical physics.

[23]  D. McShan,et al.  Lexicographic ordering: intuitive multicriteria optimization for IMRT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.