Node importance measure for scientific research collaboration from hypernetwork perspective

Original scientific paper Collaboration has become main stream and trend in interdisciplinary fields. In research collaboration organizations, to evaluate the contributions of researchers to the organization and then to identify core researchers is an important issue to carry out performance appraisal and crisis management of brain drain. Scientific research collaboration network is a basic model to investigate this question, but under the context of increasingly complex collaborative behaviour, it shows its limitations for semantic representations. In this paper, by introducing hypernetwork, a more powerful modelling tool than traditional network, and taking scientific paper co-authorship as object to construct scientific research collaboration hypernetwork (SRCH), we measure the importance of researchers in two aspects, as collaborative relationship structure and collaborative achievement value from a hypernetwork perspective. An additive weighting method with adjustable parameters is utilized to integrate the evaluation indicators of the two aspects, and then the synthetical importance evaluation of researchers is obtained. Analysis of data instance verifies that our node importance measure for scientific research collaboration from hypernetwork perspective is reasonable and effective.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping Global Science Using International Co-authorships : A Comparison of 1990 and 2000 , 2003 .

[2]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[3]  Kyo Kageura,et al.  Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks , 2004, Scientometrics.

[4]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[5]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Shadows of the Past in International Cooperation: Collaboration Profiles of the Top Five Producers of Science , 2000, Scientometrics.

[6]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Mapping library and information science in China: a coauthorship network analysis , 2009, Scientometrics.

[7]  Yasuhiro Yamashita,et al.  Patterns of scientific collaboration between Japan and France: Inter-sectoral analysis using Probabilistic Partnership Index (PPI) , 2006, Scientometrics.

[8]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  The Evolution and Emergence of Integrated Social and Financial Networks with Electronic Transactions: A Dynamic Supernetwork Theory for the Modeling, Analysis, and Computation of Financial Flows and Relationship Levels , 2004 .

[9]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[11]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Quan Xiao,et al.  A Method for Measuring Node Importance in Hypernetwork Model , 2013 .

[14]  Yosef Sheffi,et al.  Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis With Mathematical Programming Methods , 1985 .