Hamblin pronouns in modal existential wh-constructions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Arnim von Stechow,et al. Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch Der Zeitgenössischen Forschung , 1991 .
[2] Ljudmila Geist,et al. Specificity as Referential Anchoring: Evidence from Russian , 2008 .
[3] Alexander Grosu,et al. The syntax-semantics of modal existential wh constructions , 2004 .
[4] R. Šimík. Czech modal existential wh-constructions as vP-level free relatives , 2008 .
[5] Angelika Kratzer,et al. What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean , 1977 .
[6] Michael Bennett,et al. Questions in Montague grammar , 1979 .
[7] Anastasia Giannakidou,et al. The Meaning of Free Choice , 2001 .
[8] Ivano Caponigro,et al. Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Cross-linguistically , 2003 .
[9] Stephen Robert Berman,et al. On the semantics and logical form of {\it wh\/} -clauses , 1991 .
[10] Catherine Rudin,et al. Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and WH Constructions , 1987 .
[11] Rajesh Bhatt,et al. Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts , 2006 .
[12] G. C. Rappaport. On a persistent problem of Russian syntax: Sentences of the type MNE negde spat' , 1986 .
[13] Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng,et al. On the typology of wh-questions , 1997 .
[14] Maria Aloni,et al. Free choice, modals, and imperatives , 2007 .