A decision-making tool for project investments based on real options: the case of wind power generation

This paper presents how to apply a decision-making tool based on real options to assess the investment in a wind energy plant.The work shows six case studies where the main model’s parameters are analyzed. The uncertainty coming from wind regimes is simulated by using Weibull distributions and the volatility of market prices is obtained from the mean reverting process of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck type, also known as Geometric Mean Reversion (GMR). From these and other values, such as investment and maintenance costs, the Net Present Value (NPV) curve, made up of different values of NPV in different periods of the investment is calculated, as well as its average volatility.Having the key parameters of the model, a real options valuation method is applied. The volatility, strength of reversion and long-term trend of the NPV curve reflecting different periods are inserted into a trinomial investment option valuation tree. From this, it is possible to calculate the probabilities of investing right now (exercise), deferring the investment (wait), or not investing at all (abandon).This powerful decision-making tool allows wind energy investors to decide whether to invest in many different scenarios.

[1]  Eduardo S. Schwartz.  The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[2]  S. Ross,et al.  AN INTERTEMPORAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ASSET PRICES , 1985 .

[3]  W. El-khattam,et al.  Optimal investment planning for distributed generation in a competitive electricity market , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Graham Ault,et al.  Strategic analysis framework for evaluating distributed generation and utility strategies , 2003 .

[5]  Chung-Li Tseng,et al.  A Framework Using Two-Factor Price Lattices for Generation Asset Valuation , 2007, Oper. Res..

[6]  J. Sousa,et al.  Power plant multistage investment under market uncertainty , 2008 .

[7]  L. Trigeorgis.  Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[8]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Flexibility and Technology Choice in Gas Fired Power Plant Investments , 2004 .

[9]  G. Metcalf,et al.  Investment Under Alternative Return Assumptions: Comparing Random Walks and Mean Reversion , 1995 .

[10]  J. Contreras,et al.  Risk assessment of wind power generation project investments based on real options , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.

[11]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  INCORPORATING OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND START-UP COSTS IN OPTION-BASED VALUATION OF POWER GENERATION CAPACITY , 2003 .

[12]  Brian Flynn,et al.  Switched Mode Power Supplies: Design and Construction , 1992 .

[13]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Gas Fired Power Plants: Investment Timing, Operating Flexibility and Abandonment , 2004 .

[14]  J. Hull.  Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[15]  Chung-Hsiao Wang,et al.  Electric power generation planning for interrelated projects: a real options approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Electricity Prices and Power Derivatives: Evidence from the Nordic Power Exchange , 2000 .

[17]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Optimal Investment Strategies in Decentralized Renewable Power Generation Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[18]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[19]  L. Trigeorgis.  Real Options in Capital Investment: Models, Strategies, and Applications , 1995 .

[20]  Stephen A. Ross,et al.  Duration and the Measurement of Basis Risk , 1979 .

[21]  Chung-Li Tseng,et al.  Short-Term Generation Asset Valuation: A Real Options Approach , 2002, Oper. Res..