Biased and unbiased estimation in longitudinal studies with informative visit processes

The availability of data in longitudinal studies is often driven by features of the characteristics being studied. For example, clinical databases are increasingly being used for research to address longitudinal questions. Because visit times in such data are often driven by patient characteristics that may be related to the outcome being studied, the danger is that this will result in biased estimation compared to designed, prospective studies. We study longitudinal data that follow a generalized linear mixed model and use a log link to relate an informative visit process to random effects in the mixed model. This device allows us to elucidate which parameters are biased under the informative visit process and to what degree. We show that the informative visit process can badly bias estimators of parameters of covariates associated with the random effects, while allowing consistent estimation of other parameters.

[1]  N M Laird,et al.  An alternative parameterization of the general linear mixture model for longitudinal data with non‐ignorable drop‐outs , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Jianguo Sun,et al.  Regression Analysis of Longitudinal Data in the Presence of Informative Observation and Censoring Times , 2007 .

[3]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Latent Pattern Mixture Models for Informative Intermittent Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies , 2004, Biometrics.

[4]  Paul J. Rathouz,et al.  FIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR LONGITUDINAL BINARY DATA WITH DROP-OUTS MISSING AT RANDOM , 2004 .

[5]  Xingwei Tong,et al.  Regression Analysis of Panel Count Data with Dependent Observation Times , 2007, Biometrics.

[6]  M. Kenward.  Selection models for repeated measurements with non-random dropout: an illustration of sensitivity. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[8]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Longitudinal Studies with Outcome‐Dependent Follow‐Up , 2002, Biometrics.

[9]  M. Wulfsohn,et al.  A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. , 1997, Biometrics.

[10]  Somnath Datta,et al.  Marginal Analyses of Clustered Data When Cluster Size Is Informative , 2003, Biometrics.

[11]  Joseph G Ibrahim,et al.  Estimation in regression models for longitudinal binary data with outcome-dependent follow-up. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[12]  Lei Liu,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data in the Presence of Informative Observational Times and a Dependent Terminal Event, with Application to Medical Cost Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[13]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with informative cluster sizes. , 2011, Biometrika.