Molecular Dynamics Simulation on the Conformational Transition of the Mad2 Protein from the Open to the Closed State

The Mad2 protein, with two distinct conformations of open- and closed-states, is a key player in the spindle checkpoint. The closed Mad2 state is more active than the open one. We carried out conventional and targeted molecular dynamics simulations for the two stable Mad2 states and their conformational transition to address the dynamical transition mechanism from the open to the closed state. The intermediate structure in the transition process shows exposure of the β6 strand and an increase of space around the binding sites of β6 strand due to the unfolding of the β7/8 sheet and movement of the β6/4/5 sheet close to the αC helix. Therefore, Mad2 binding to the Cdc20 protein in the spindle checkpoint is made possible. The interconversion between these two states might facilitate the functional activity of the Mad2 protein. Motion correlation analysis revealed the allosteric network between the β1 strand and β7/8 sheet via communication of the β5-αC loop and the β6/4/5 sheet in this transition process.

[1]  Geert J. P. L. Kops,et al.  On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  J. Peters.  The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  E. Nigg,et al.  Probing the in vivo function of Mad1:C‐Mad2 in the spindle assembly checkpoint , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[5]  H. Edelsbrunner,et al.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  M. Rapé,et al.  The Multiple Layers of Ubiquitin-Dependent Cell Cycle Control , 2009 .

[8]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  The Influence of Catalysis on Mad2 Activation Dynamics , 2009, PLoS biology.

[9]  Timothy Cardozo,et al.  Control of chromosome stability by the β-TrCP–REST–Mad2 axis , 2008, Nature.

[10]  L. Nezi,et al.  Accumulation of Mad2–Cdc20 complex during spindle checkpoint activation requires binding of open and closed conformers of Mad2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Jie Liang,et al.  CASTp: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  J. Rizo,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  Yong Duan,et al.  Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model , 2004, Proteins.

[14]  J. Rizo,et al.  p31comet Blocks Mad2 Activation through Structural Mimicry , 2007, Cell.

[15]  M. Swindells,et al.  Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  A. Musacchio,et al.  The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  P. Krüger,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.

[18]  M. Mapelli,et al.  MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  J. Rizo,et al.  Insights into Mad2 Regulation in the Spindle Checkpoint Revealed by the Crystal Structure of the Symmetric Mad2 Dimer , 2008, PLoS biology.

[20]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[21]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[22]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. , 2008, Structure.

[23]  D. Fan,et al.  Depression of MAD2 inhibits apoptosis of gastric cancer cells by upregulating Bcl-2 and interfering mitochondrion pathway. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Explicit solvent dynamics and energetics of HIV‐1 protease flap opening and closing , 2010, Proteins.

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Jie Liang,et al.  CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  The Mad1/Mad2 Complex as a Template for Mad2 Activation in the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2005, Current Biology.

[28]  A. Ciliberto,et al.  In Vitro FRAP Identifies the Minimal Requirements for Mad2 Kinetochore Dynamics , 2006, Current Biology.

[29]  Alexey G. Murzin,et al.  Metamorphic Proteins , 2008, Science.

[30]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20 , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  The Mad2 Conformational Dimer: Structure and Implications for the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint , 2007, Cell.

[32]  A. Składanowski,et al.  DNA structure and integrity checkpoints during the cell cycle and their role in drug targeting and sensitivity of tumor cells to anticancer treatment. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[34]  Jürgen Schlitter,et al.  Targeted Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Conformational Change-Application to the T ↔ R Transition in Insulin , 1993 .

[35]  S. Nomoto,et al.  Identification of frequent impairment of the mitotic checkpoint and molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and p55CDC, in human lung cancers , 1999, Oncogene.

[36]  E. Salmon,et al.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  L. Nezi,et al.  Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[38]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[39]  S. Tsao,et al.  Significance of MAD2 expression to mitotic checkpoint control in ovarian cancer cells. , 2002, Cancer research.

[40]  K. Wood,et al.  Kinetic analysis of Mad2-Cdc20 formation: conformational changes in Mad2 are catalyzed by a C-Mad2-ligand complex. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[41]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. , 2009, Developmental cell.