The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS

Editor's Summary Since its start in the mid-19th century, the measurement of document attributes and interrelationships has evolved into the formal field of bibliometrics, becoming solidly established in information science and reaching into other domains. Bibliometric methods have been used to shed light on organizational structure of library and information science (LIS), the reach and influence of LIS research and on interdisciplinarity and the emergence of new fields of study. Data from citation indexes from 1900 through 2011 show the rise of metrics, with the decade starting in 2010 likely to be the most productive and influential. The most cited researchers in information science in 2010 and 2011 focus on metrics, and the use of the term bibliometri* has surged since 2000. The study of metrics in medicine is increasing rapidly, though less so in the social sciences, humanities and natural sciences. Among LIS subtopics, metrics appears to have the strongest influence outside the field.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[3]  Steve Fuller,et al.  Edward J. Hackett;, Olga Amsterdamska;, Michael Lynch;, Judy Wajcman (Editors).The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. xi + 1,080 pp., illus., indexes. Third edition. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press, 2007. $55 (cloth). , 2009 .

[4]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.

[5]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Differences in the construction of sci based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first over view , 1996, Scientometrics.

[6]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  D. Hicks The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .

[9]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[10]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[11]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[13]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Y. Gingras Les formes spcifiques de l'internationalit du champ scientifique , 2002 .

[15]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Science of Science and Reflexivity , 2004 .

[16]  P. Wouters The citation culture , 1999 .

[17]  Galina F. Gordukalova : Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States , 1997 .