Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

The negative impact of external interference on working memory (WM) performance is well documented; yet, the mechanisms underlying this disruption are not sufficiently understood. In this study, electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were recorded in separate experiments that each introduced different types of visual interference during a period of WM maintenance: distraction (irrelevant stimuli) and interruption (stimuli that required attention). The data converged to reveal that regardless of the type of interference, the magnitude of processing interfering stimuli in the visual cortex (as rapidly as 100 ms) predicted subsequent WM recognition accuracy for stored items. fMRI connectivity analyses suggested that in the presence of distraction, encoded items were maintained throughout the delay period via connectivity between the middle frontal gyrus and visual association cortex, whereas memoranda were not maintained when subjects were interrupted but rather reactivated in the postinterruption period. These results elucidate the mechanisms of external interference on WM performance and highlight similarities and differences of distraction and multitasking.

[1]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Brain activity related to working memory and distraction in children and adults. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Group analysis and the subject factor in functional magnetic resonance imaging: Analysis of fifty right‐handed healthy subjects in a semantic language task , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Reactivation of Memory: Role of Medial Temporal Lobe and Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[9]  H. Pashler.  STEVENS' HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2002 .

[10]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  B. Postle,et al.  Seeking the Neural Substrates of Visual Working Memory Storage , 2003, Cortex.

[12]  Kartik K. Sreenivasan,et al.  Selective Attention Supports Working Memory Maintenance by Modulating Perceptual Processing of Distractors , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Katsuyuki Sakai,et al.  Prefrontal selection and medial temporal lobe reactivation in retrieval of short-term verbal information. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  A Trial-Based Experimental Design for fMRI , 1997, NeuroImage.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs) , 2004, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[17]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Amishi P. Jha,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in resolving distractor interference , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Unifying prefrontal cortex function: Executive control, neural networks, and top-down modulation. , 2007 .

[21]  E E Smith,et al.  The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Philip A. Kragel,et al.  Regional brain differences in the effect of distraction during the delay interval of a working memory task , 2007, Brain Research.

[23]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Luck,et al.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[25]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Parahippocampal Reactivation Signal at Retrieval after Interruption of Rehearsal , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Postle,et al.  Maintenance versus Manipulation of Information Held in Working Memory: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[28]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Sustained Mnemonic Response in the Human Middle Frontal Gyrus during On-Line Storage of Spatial Memoranda , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  B. Postle,et al.  Effects of verbal and nonverbal interference on spatial and object visual working memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[31]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[32]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Opposing influences of emotional and non-emotional distracters upon sustained prefrontal cortex activity during a delayed-response working memory task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Duncan.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[36]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[37]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[46]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Prefrontal and parietal contributions to refreshing: An rTMS study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[47]  R. Passingham,et al.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Knight,et al.  Contribution of Human Prefrontal Cortex to Delay Performance , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .