Lognormal distribution in the digg online social network

AbstractWe analyse the number of votes, called the digg value, which measures the impact or popularity of submitted information in the Online Social Network Digg. Experiments over five years indicate that the digg value of a story on the first frontpage follows closely a lognormal distribution. While the law of proportionate effect explains lognormal behavior, the proportionality factor a in that law is assumed to have a constant mean, whereas experiments show that a decreases linearly with time. Our hypothesis, the probability that a user diggs (votes) on a story given that he observes a certain digg valuemequalsa×m, can explain observations, provided that the population of users that can digg on that story is close to a Gaussian.

[1]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[2]  Bernard Monjardet MATHÉMATIQUES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES , 1977 .

[3]  E. Crow,et al.  Lognormal Distributions: Theory and Applications , 1987 .

[4]  J. Deese,et al.  Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  William Shockley,et al.  On the Statistics of Individual Variations of Productivity in Research Laboratories , 1957, Proceedings of the IRE.

[6]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the popularity of online content , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Raj Kumar Pan,et al.  The statistical laws of popularity: universal properties of the box-office dynamics of motion pictures , 2010, 1010.2634.

[8]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  P. Embrechts,et al.  The central limit theorem for summability methods of I.I.D. random variables , 1984 .

[10]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[12]  W. Sullivan Bulletin de la statistique générale de la France , 1912 .

[13]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Are Friends Overrated? A Study for the Social Aggregator Digg.com , 2011, Networking.

[14]  W. Stahel,et al.  Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues , 2001 .