Extended depth of focus with induced spherical aberration in light-adjustable intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE To evaluate the quality of vision and depth of focus induced by controlled amounts of negative spherical aberration in patients implanted bilaterally with light-adjustable intraocular lenses. DESIGN Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS Seventeen patients were implanted and treated with appropriate spatial irradiance light profiles. One eye was set for emmetropia, and the fellow eye received an additional aspheric light treatment to induce controlled amounts of negative spherical aberration. We used a Hartmann-Shack sensor to measure the eye's refraction and aberrations for a 4-mm pupil diameter. Decimal visual acuity (VA) was measured using a micro-display placed at 10 m, 60 cm, 40 cm, and 30 cm. RESULTS Eyes treated with aspheric profiles were divided into 2 groups depending on the final amount of induced negative spherical aberration: low [-0.05, -0.10 μm] and high [-0.13, -0.23 μm]. In both groups, the mean uncorrected decimal VA at 60 cm was over 0.90. In the first group, distance VA was 0.97 ± 0.16, but in the second group it was lower (0.76 ± 0.16). As expected, the VA for nearer distances is higher in the eyes with a larger magnitude of spherical aberration (P value < .01): 0.94 ± 0.10 and 0.73 ± 0.16 at 40 and 30 cm, respectively, in comparison with 0.71 ± 0.15 and 0.50 ± 0.14. Binocular summation with the fellow eye, adjusted for emmetropia, produces an excellent binocular distance VA (>1.10) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Controlled amounts of negative spherical aberration and defocus can be induced in eyes implanted with adjustable intraocular lenses to enhance near vision.

[1]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Customized eye models for determining optimized intraocular lenses power , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[2]  C. McGhee,et al.  The influence of tilt, decentration, and pupil size on the higher-order aberration profile of aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[3]  W. Haigis Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis‐L formula , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  P. Artal,et al.  Corneal wave aberration from videokeratography: accuracy and limitations of the procedure. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Binocular adaptive optics vision analyzer with full control over the complex pupil functions. , 2011, Optics letters.

[6]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal aberrations before and after small-incision cataract surgery. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Daniel M Schwartz,et al.  Light-adjustable lens: customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations. , 2006, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[8]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive optics visual simulator. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Correction of residual hyperopia after cataract surgery using the light adjustable intraocular lens technology. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Makoto Oki,et al.  Colorful patterns reveal the structures in fluids , 2003, J. Vis..

[11]  Yoshimichi Tanida,et al.  On Founding the Journal of Visualization , 1998 .

[12]  R. Grubbs,et al.  Correction of myopia after cataract surgery with a light-adjustable lens. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[13]  P Artal,et al.  Analysis of the performance of the Hartmann-Shack sensor in the human eye. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Shu-Wen Chang,et al.  Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  R. Grubbs,et al.  Use of the light-adjustable lens to correct astigmatism after cataract surgery , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  Fritz H Hengerer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an ultraviolet light adjustable intraocular lens implanted after cataract removal: eighteen months follow-up. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[17]  Ken Hayashi,et al.  Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision. , 2011, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  J. Żabiński American National Standards Institute (ANSI) , 2010 .

[19]  C K King,et al.  Influence of astigmatism on multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Daniel M Schwartz,et al.  Light-adjustable lens. , 2003, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[21]  P. Artal,et al.  Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[22]  P. Artal,et al.  The human eye is an example of robust optical design. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[23]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  R. Grubbs,et al.  Light-adjustable lens: development of in vitro nomograms. , 2004, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[25]  J. Narvaez,et al.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  D. Azar,et al.  Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.