Telling lies.

Men and women (20 each) were videotaped while describing someone they liked, someone they disliked, someone they were ambivalent about, someone they were indifferent about, someone they liked as though they disliked him or her, and someone they disliked as thought they like him or her. Accuracy at detecting that some deception had occurred was far greater than accuracy at detecting the true underlying affect, and people who were good at detecting that deception was occurring were not particularly skilled at reading the speakers' underlying affects. However, people whose deception attempts were more easily detected by others also had their underlying affects read more easily. Speakers whose lies were seen more readily by men also had their lies seen more readily by women, and observers better able to see the underlying affects of women were better able to see the underlying affects of men. Skill at lying successfully was unrelated to skill at catching others in their lies. A histrionic strategy (hamming) was very effective in deceiving others, and this strategy was employed more by more Machiavellian people, who also tended to get caught less often in their lies. Methodological considerations and systematic programs for future research are discussed.

[1]  T. Snee,et al.  The Nature of Human Conflicts , 1932, The Psychological Clinic.

[2]  The Ability to Judge Truth-Telling, OR Lying, from the Voice as Transmitted Over A Public Address System , 1941 .

[3]  John Thibaut,et al.  VISUAL INTERACTION IN RELATION TO MACHIAVELLIANISM AND AN UNETHICAL ACT. , 1966 .

[4]  James A. Thurber,et al.  ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF DECEPTION WHEN AN INTERVIEW IS WATCHED, HEARD, AND READ , 1968 .

[5]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[6]  Interviewee Speech Behavior under Conditions of Endogenously-Present and Exogenously-Induced Motivational States. , 1970 .

[7]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Nonverbal betrayal of feeling. , 1971 .

[8]  D. Lykken,et al.  Psychology and the lie detector industry. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[9]  M. Knapp,et al.  An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct , 1974 .

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[11]  R. Freedle,et al.  Aspects of language pragmatics and the social perception of lying , 1974, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[12]  R. G. Hunt,et al.  Nonverbal indicators of Affect and Deception in an Interview Setting1 , 1975 .

[13]  R. Feldman.  Nonverbal Disclosure of Teacher Deception and Interpersonal Affect. , 1976 .

[14]  P. Ekman,et al.  BODY MOVEMENT AND VOICE PITCH IN DECEPTIVE INTERACTION , 1976 .

[15]  D. C. Raskin,et al.  Physiological measures and the detection of deception. , 1977, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  L A Streeter,et al.  Pitch changes during attempted deception. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues. , 1978 .

[18]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. , 1978 .

[20]  Albert A. Harrison,et al.  Cues to Deception in an Interview Situation. , 1978 .

[21]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Verbal, Facial, and Paralinguistic Cues to the Detection of Truth and Lying , 1978 .

[22]  R. Feldman,et al.  Detection of Deception in Adults and Children via Facial Expressions. , 1979 .