An AGC Dynamics-Constrained Economic Dispatch Model

The state-of-the-art MW-frequency control is performed by two hierarchical mechanisms: economic dispatch (ED) and automatic generation control (AGC). The ED is solved every 5 min identifying the most economic generation dispatch and reserve schedule. AGC is a feedback control system that regulates area control error by sending signals to regulation reserve every 2–6 s. In system with high renewable penetration and associated high net-load variability, the conventional ED-AGC hierarchical model may result in degraded MW-frequency performance and increasing operational cost. In this paper, an AGC dynamic constrained ED model is proposed to provide a more reliable and economical regulation reserve schedule in handling high net load variability. The continuous AGC dynamics is transformed into discrete state-space model, and the fast AGC dynamics are eliminated to reduce the system order. The discretized reduced-order AGC dynamics are incorporated into the ED to optimize the regulation schedule. The proposed model can be applied in a look-ahead mode with very short-term load forecast or in a look-back mode to provide a “perfect dispatch” benchmark based on historical net load data. The 5-bus and 118-bus systems are tested to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

[1]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[2]  M. D. Ilic,et al.  Enhanced Automatic Generation Control (E-AGC) for future electric energy systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[3]  Na Li,et al.  Connecting Automatic Generation Control and Economic Dispatch From an Optimization View , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[4]  P. Kokotovic,et al.  A decomposition of near-optimum regulators for systems with slow and fast modes , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[5]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  Secondary Reserve Dispatch Accounting for Wind Power Randomness and Spillage , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[6]  W. Charytoniuk,et al.  Very short-term load forecasting using artificial neural networks , 2000 .

[7]  Anne Kuefer,et al.  Voltage Stability Of Electric Power Systems , 2016 .

[8]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Ross Baldick,et al.  CPS1 Compliance-Constrained AGC Gain Determination for a Single-Balancing Authority , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Viktoria Neimane,et al.  Using Standard Deviation as a Measure of Increased Operational Reserve Requirement for Wind Power , 2008 .

[11]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Estimation of Regulation Reserve Requirement Based on Control Performance Standard , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Nader Samaan,et al.  Prediction of regulation reserve requirements in california ISO balancing authority area based on BAAL , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  Dan J. Trudnowski,et al.  Real-time very short-term load prediction for power-system automatic generation control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[14]  Yang Weng,et al.  Toward combining intra-real time dispatch (RTD) and AGC for on-line power balancing , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.