Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement

[1]  W. P. Pauw,et al.  Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: foothold for equity or Achilles heel? , 2019, Making Climate Action More Effective.

[2]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  What are the implications of the Paris Agreement for inequality? , 2019, Making Climate Action More Effective.

[3]  N. Molenaers,et al.  Responsibility, capacity, greenness or vulnerability? What explains the levels of climate aid provided by bilateral donors? , 2018, Environmental Politics.

[4]  J. Roberts,et al.  Cascading biases against poorer countries , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[5]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Beyond headline mitigation numbers: we need more transparent and comparable NDCs to achieve the Paris Agreement on climate change , 2018, Climatic Change.

[6]  H. Winkler,et al.  Countries start to explain how their climate contributions are fair: more rigour needed , 2018, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[7]  David E.H.J. Gernaat,et al.  Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C , 2017 .

[8]  Lukas Hermwille,et al.  UNFCCC before and after Paris – what's necessary for an effective climate regime? , 2017 .

[9]  F. Weiler,et al.  Allocation of aid for adaptation to climate change: Do vulnerable countries receive more support? , 2017, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[10]  C. Voigt,et al.  ‘Dynamic Differentiation’: The Principles of CBDR-RC, Progression and Highest Possible Ambition in the Paris Agreement , 2016, Transnational Environmental Law.

[11]  Daniel Bodansky,et al.  The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope? , 2016, American Journal of International Law.

[12]  L. Rajamani.  AMBITION AND DIFFERENTIATION IN THE 2015 PARIS AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND UNDERLYING POLITICS , 2016, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[13]  F. Jotzo,et al.  Sharing the Global Climate Finance Effort Fairly with Limited Coordination , 2015, Global Environmental Politics.

[14]  Harald Winkler,et al.  Equity, sustainable development and climate policy , 2014 .

[15]  J. Roberts,et al.  The Politics of International Climate Adaptation Funding: Justice and Divisions in the Greenhouse , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.

[16]  Thomas Deleuil.  The Common but Differentiated Responsibilities Principle: Changes in Continuity after the Durban Conference of the Parties , 2012 .

[17]  J. Depledge,et al.  The global climate change regime , 2009 .

[18]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[19]  John J. Mearsheimer,et al.  The False Promise of International Institutions , 1994 .

[20]  Duncan Snidal,et al.  The Relative-Gains Problem for International Cooperation , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[21]  R. Makomere,et al.  Squaring the Circle: Development Prospects Within the Paris Agreement , 2018 .

[22]  Brenda L. Mackey,et al.  A Four-Step Process for Formulating and Evaluating Legal Commitments Under the Paris Agreement , 2018 .

[23]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals , 2017 .

[24]  P. Pauw,et al.  Self-Differentiation of Countries' Responsibilities Addressing Climate Change through Intended Nationally Determined Contributions , 2016 .

[25]  Clara Brandi,et al.  Different perspectives on differentiated responsibilities: a state-of-the-art review of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities in international negotiations , 2014 .

[26]  M. Luomi,et al.  Summary of the Lima Climate Change Conference: 1-14 December 2014 , 2014 .

[27]  N. Dubash.  Copenhagen: climate of mistrust. , 2009 .

[28]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .