Optimizing the reactive power balance between a distribution and transmission grid through iteratively updated grid equivalents

This paper focuses on a scenario with a high amount of renewable generators (DGs) in the distribution grid; a local grid operator (DSO) utilizes reactive power provision by the DGs, to improve the reactive power balance at the connection points to the transmission grid. At the same time, the transmission grid operator (TSO) aims to optimize his voltage, by computing reactive power setpoints for the DSO. This is a decentralized optimization problem, where two optimizers ("DSO" and "TSO") balance the reactive power flow between their grid areas. No optimizer has detailed information about the neighbouring grid area and uses a very simple equivalent model for it. In case these equivalents are updated iteratively, we find that both optimizers mostly converge within only a few iterations for a realistic Danish grid topology. However, it is also found that the accuracy of the result highly depends on the built-in component models that each optimizer uses, within its own grid area.

[1]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  K. Strunz,et al.  Design of benchmark of medium voltage distribution network for investigation of DG integration , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[3]  Friederich Kupzog,et al.  Rapid control prototyping platform for networked smart grid systems , 2013, IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[4]  K. M. Muttaqi,et al.  Online Voltage Control in Distribution Systems With Multiple Voltage Regulating Devices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[5]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  A HLA based simulator architecture for co-simulating ICT based power system control and protection systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[6]  Martin Braun,et al.  Technical and economical assessment of reactive power provision from distributed generators: Case study area of East Denmark , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.

[7]  Nima Amjady,et al.  Multiobjective clearing of reactive power market in deregulated power systems , 2009 .

[8]  Martin Braun,et al.  Analysis of a reactive power exchange between distribution and transmission grids , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Inteligent Energy Systems (IWIES).

[9]  K. C. Mamandur,et al.  Optimal Control of Reactive Power flow for Improvements in Voltage Profiles and for Real Power Loss Minimization , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  M. Petit,et al.  Evaluation of network equivalents for voltage optimization in multi-area power systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[11]  Hany E. Farag,et al.  A Two Ways Communication-Based Distributed Control for Voltage Regulation in Smart Distribution Feeders , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Rui Pestana,et al.  The interaction between DSO and TSO to increase DG penetration — The Portuguese example , 2012 .

[13]  M. Braun,et al.  Time in the Sun: The Challenge of High PV Penetration in the German Electric Grid , 2013, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[14]  Roman Schwalbe,et al.  DG DemoNet validation: Voltage control from simulation to field test , 2011, 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies.

[15]  Damien Ernst,et al.  Decentralized Reactive Power Dispatch for a Time-Varying Multi-TSO System , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.