"Safe" charge-injection waveforms for iridium oxide (AIROF) microelectrodes

Use of anodic bias improves the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) microelectrodes. Asymmetric waveforms, in which the charge balancing anodic phase is delivered at a lower current density and longer pulse width, has been found to allow for higher values of anodic bias voltages, thus maximizing the AIROF charge-injection capacity. Limiting the voltage excursion of the AIROF below the value at which electrolysis of water occurs is essential to maintaining the long-term viability of implanted electrodes. However, maintaining the electrodes at an anodic bias state while keeping the electrode voltage within these electrochemically "safe" limits complicates the topology of the electronic driver circuitry. We present two possible driver topologies that use compliance-voltage limitation in combination with cathodic current modification.

[1]  J. Ehrlich,et al.  Charge-injection waveforms for iridium oxide (AIROF) microelectrodes , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[2]  James D. Weiland,et al.  In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes , 2000, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[4]  X Liu,et al.  Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Bladder and urethral pressures evoked by microstimulation of the sacral spinal cord in cats , 1999, Brain Research.

[6]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  A characterization of the effects on neuronal excitability due to prolonged microstimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  D.J. Anderson,et al.  Batch fabricated thin-film electrodes for stimulation of the central auditory system , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  X. Beebe,et al.  Charge injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes with 0.2 ms pulses in bicarbonate buffered saline (neurological stimulation application) , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  D. McCreery,et al.  Neuronal activity evoked by chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes , 1986, Experimental Neurology.