Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions

The first decade of consumer neuroscience research has produced groundbreaking work in identifying the basic neural processes underlying human judgment and decision making, with the majority of such studies published in neuroscience journals and influencing models of brain function. Yet for the field of consumer neuroscience to thrive in the next decade, the current emphasis on basic science research must be extended into marketing theory and practice. The authors suggest five concrete ways that neuroscientific methods can be fruitfully applied to marketing. They then outline three fundamental challenges facing consumer neuroscientists and offer potential solutions for addressing them. The authors conclude by describing how consumer neuroscience can become an important complement to research and practice in marketing.

[1]  B. Weber,et al.  Individual Differences in Marketing Placebo Effects: Evidence from Brain Imaging and Behavioral Experiments , 2015 .

[2]  U. Karmarkar,et al.  Cost Conscious? The Neural and Behavioral Impact of Price Primacy on Decision Making , 2015 .

[3]  Plassmann Hilke,et al.  How Expectancies Shape Consumption Experiences , 2014 .

[4]  A. Rangel,et al.  Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[5]  S. McClure,et al.  Behavioral and neural correlates of increased self-control in the absence of increased willpower , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Advancing consumer neuroscience , 2014 .

[7]  Florian Lange,et al.  Sweet delusion. Glucose drinks fail to counteract ego depletion , 2014, Appetite.

[8]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Neural Activity Reveals Preferences Without Choices , 2013, American economic journal. Microeconomics.

[10]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  C. Dweck,et al.  Beliefs about willpower determine the impact of glucose on self-control , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .

[14]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Translating upwards: linking the neural and social sciences via neuroeconomics , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Israel Liberzon,et al.  Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making , 2012 .

[16]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  From Neural Responses to Population Behavior , 2012, Psychological science.

[17]  R. Petty,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model , 2012 .

[18]  Hilke Plassmann,et al.  Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook , 2012 .

[19]  G. Berns,et al.  A Neural Predictor of Cultural Popularity , 2010 .

[20]  R. Poldrack Inferring Mental States from Neuroimaging Data: From Reverse Inference to Large-Scale Decoding , 2011, Neuron.

[21]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  New Scanner Data for Brand Marketers: How Neuroscience Can Help Better Understand Differences in Brand Preferences , 2011 .

[22]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[23]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  The Cognitive Atlas: Toward a Knowledge Foundation for Cognitive Neuroscience , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[24]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[25]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Within- and cross-participant classifiers reveal different neural coding of information , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  H. Chua,et al.  Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Hypothetical and Real Choice Differentially Activate Common Valuation Areas , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Kable The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: A functional overview. , 2011, Journal of neuroscience, psychology, and economics.

[29]  P. Glimcher Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis , 2010 .

[30]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological Mapping Mental Function to Brain Structure: How Can Cognitive Neuroimaging Succeed? on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[32]  J. Haynes,et al.  Neural Responses to Unattended Products Predict Later Consumer Choices , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  V. Walsh,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Decision Making in a Probabilistic Guessing Task , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Daniel T. Knoepfle,et al.  Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex decreases valuations during food choices , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  S. Huettel,et al.  Resolving Response, Decision, and Strategic Control: Evidence for a Functional Topography in Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Marion Smits,et al.  A Sales Force–Specific Theory-of-Mind Scale: Tests of Its Validity by Classical Methods and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009 .

[39]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Evidence for a Common Representation of Decision Values for Dissimilar Goods in Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  P. Glimcher,et al.  The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy , 2009, Neuron.

[41]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Separate Neural Mechanisms Underlie Choices and Strategic Preferences in Risky Decision Making , 2009, Neuron.

[42]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Local pattern classification differentiates processes of economic valuation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  G. Harrison NEUROECONOMICS: A CRITICAL RECONSIDERATION , 2008, Economics and Philosophy.

[44]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Willingness to Pay in Everyday Economic Transactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Robert A. Koeppe,et al.  Individual Differences in Reward Responding Explain Placebo-Induced Expectations and Effects , 2007, Neuron.

[48]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[50]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[51]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  A. Gutchess,et al.  A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments , 2006 .

[54]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Faruk Gul,et al.  The Case for Mindless Economics , 2005 .

[56]  D. Ariely,et al.  Ruminating about Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions , 2005 .

[57]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Placebo Effects of Marketing Actions: Consumers May Get What They Pay For , 2005 .

[58]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: Why Economics Needs Brains , 2004 .

[59]  A. Peters,et al.  The selfish brain: competition for energy resources , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[60]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[62]  G McCarthy,et al.  The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[63]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Brain-Imaging Detection of Visual Scene Encoding in Long-term Memory for TV Commercials , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[64]  H. Damasio,et al.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[66]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[67]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.