The Sudbury Igneous Complex : Viscous emulsion differentiation of a superheated impact melt sheet

The Sudbury Igneous Complex of Ontario, Canada, is the remnant of a voluminous melt sheet produced in a few minutes by impact of a massive meteorite into continental crust 1.85 Ga ago. The transient cavity and melting zone reached the Moho and instantly (∼2 min) relaxed to form a more familiar large, shallow crater holding a thick, superheated (∼1700 °C) melt sheet covered by ∼2 km of breccia. There is little about the resulting bimodal igneous complex that resembles crystallization of well-known sheet-like bodies of similar composition. Yet, the norite and granophyre exhibit a remarkable similarity in isotopic and trace element compositions, suggesting an intimate common parentage from the surrounding crust. This petrogenetic enigma is explained here as a natural, unavoidable consequence of the impact process in the rapid formation of a superheated magmatic emulsion, which we take as the high-temperature equivalent of breccia. A wide spectrum of viscously discrete, interdispersed parcels of mafic and felsic liquids, reflecting the compositional heterogeneity of the target crustal materials, formed the emulsion. Within days to months, the emulsion components separated according to their relative densities into a bimodal norite-granophyre assemblage that formed the basic structure of the present Sudbury Igneous Complex. There is clear evidence of this emulsion in the earliest dikes (i.e., offsets), which likely give the earliest state of the nascent melt sheet. Immediately following emulsion separation, the strongly superheated bimodal melt sheet underwent vigorous thermal convection in each layer. These convective motions homogenized and rapidly cooled the magma to the liquidus temperatures, whereupon convection ceased. The pattern of convection was pinned in place by the embayment topography of the crater floor, which in turn played a pivotal role in directing sulfide deposition into the embayments. All further cooling was by conduction of heat through the upper and lower boundaries during which time solidification fronts were established and propagated inward from the upper and lower margins. There is clear evidence of solidification from the floor upward and the roof downward. Minimal differentiation and compositional modification took place throughout cooling and solidification. Nevertheless, during the solidification stage, granitic rock fragments on the crater floor and rafts of fallback breccia from the thick overlying Onaping Formation became unstable and entered the melt sheet, and the partially melted remnants collected at the interface between the norite and granophyre. Some interstitial melt from the norite also percolated upward, and, altogether, the blocks and melt produced the distinctive chemical and physical characteristics of the unusual Transition Zone. The Sudbury melt sheet is, in essence, a full-scale magmatic experiment. The conditions of formation, relative to any other large terrestrial magma, are “precisely” known. Thus the clear lack of any significant modal layering, the overall homogeneous nature of each unit, and the lack of any significant chemical differentiation through crystal fractionation establish Sudbury as a valuable example of what does not happen under the initial conditions long assumed to prevail at the formation of most large magma chambers.

[1]  G. Walker Acid volcanic rocks in Iceland , 1966 .

[2]  B. French Sudbury Structure, Ontario: Some Petrographic Evidence for Origin by Meteorite Impact , 1967, Science.

[3]  R. E. Kelly,et al.  Convective stability of incompressible fluids , 1976 .

[4]  A. J. Naldrett,et al.  Cryptic variation and the petrology of the Sudbury nickel irruptive , 1970 .

[5]  A. Davis,et al.  Energetics of multicomponent diffusion in molten CaO-Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 , 2002 .

[6]  A. Philpotts,et al.  Role of plagioclase crystal chains in the differentiation of partly crystallized basaltic magma , 1998, Nature.

[7]  G. Brandeis,et al.  TRANSIENT MAGMATIC CONVECTION PROLONGED BY SOLIDIFICATION , 1990 .

[8]  M. Avermann Origin of the polymict, allochthonous breccias of the Onaping Formation, Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada , 1992 .

[9]  R. Dietz Sudbury Structure as an Astrobleme , 1964, The Journal of Geology.

[10]  R. Dietz,et al.  Shatter-cone Orientation at Sudbury, Canada , 1964, Nature.

[11]  R. Grieve,et al.  The Sudbury Igneous Complex: A Differentiated Impact Melt Sheet , 2002 .

[12]  G. Homsy,et al.  The onset of convection in fluid layers heated rapidly in a time-dependent manner , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  D. Walker,et al.  Abyssal tholeiites from the Oceanographer Fracture Zone , 1979 .

[14]  M. Hort,et al.  Convection and Crystallization in a Liquid Cooled from above: an Experimental and Theoretical Study , 1999 .

[15]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  The physics of earthquakes , 2001 .

[16]  J. Turner,et al.  Buoyancy Effects in Fluids , 1973 .

[17]  A. Miall,et al.  Sedimentology of the lower huronian supergroup (early proterozoic), Elliot lake area, Ontario, Canada , 1989 .

[18]  Bruce D. Marsh,et al.  The convective liquidus in a solidifying magma chamber: a fluid dynamic investigation , 1989, Nature.

[19]  A. J. Naldrett,et al.  A Study of the Strathcona Mine and Its Bearing on the Origin of the Nickel-Copper Ores of the Sudbury District, Ontario , 1967 .

[20]  B. Marsh On bimodal differentiation by solidification front instability in basaltic magmas, part 1: basic mechanics , 2002 .

[21]  L. Silver,et al.  Potassic Granophyre Associated with Precambrian Diabase, Sierra Ancha, Central Arizona , 1975 .

[22]  Leo P. Kadanoff,et al.  Turbulent heat flow: Structures and scaling , 2001 .

[23]  S. Chandrasekhar Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability , 1961 .

[24]  W. Deer,et al.  The Petrology of the Skaergaard Intrusion, Kangerdlugssuaq, East Greenland , 1940 .

[25]  R. Keays,et al.  The early tectono-magmatic evolution of the Southern Province: implications from the Agnew Intrusion, central Ontario, Canada , 1998 .

[26]  H. S. Yoder,et al.  Contemporaneous basaltic and rhyolitic magmas , 1973 .

[27]  B. Marsh On Convective Style and Vigor in Sheet-like Magma Chambers , 1989 .

[28]  G. M. Brown,et al.  Layered Igneous Rocks , 1967 .

[29]  I. Mcdougall Potassium-Argon Ages from Lavas of the Hawaiian Islands , 1964 .

[30]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets , 2001 .

[31]  R. Grieve,et al.  The Sudbury Structure' Controversial or Misunderstood? , 1991 .

[32]  G. Chai,et al.  Origin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario - differentiate of two separate magmas , 1993 .

[33]  A. J. Naldrett,et al.  The Geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure , 1984 .

[34]  R. Viskanta,et al.  Inward solidification of a superheated liquid in a cooled horizontal tube , 1982 .

[35]  A. Deutsch Isotope systematics support the impact origin of the Sudbury Structure (Ontario, Canada) , 1992 .

[36]  B. Dressler,et al.  Recrystallized impact glasses of the Onaping Formation and the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Sudbury Structure, Ontario, Canada , 1996 .

[37]  J. Spray,et al.  Pseudotachylytic rock distribution and genesis within the Sudbury impact structure , 1992 .

[38]  B. Levi Clouds of Trapped Cooled Ions Condense into Crystals , 1988 .

[39]  Mark S. Ghiorso,et al.  Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures , 1995 .

[40]  A. Green,et al.  Deep geometry of the Sudbury structure from seismic reflection profiling , 1992 .

[41]  I. Mcdougall Differentiation of the Tasmanian Dolerites: Red Hill Dolerite-Granophyre Association , 1962 .

[42]  A. J. Naldrett,et al.  Petrology of the upper irruptive rocks, Sudbury, Ontario , 1975 .

[43]  A. Deutsch,et al.  Sudbury Igneous Complex: Simulating phase equilibria and in situ differentiation for two proposed parental magmas , 1999 .

[44]  N. L. Bowen The Later Stages of the Evolution of the Igneous Rocks , 1915, The Journal of Geology.

[45]  E. Watson,et al.  Diffusion in silicate melts: I. Self diffusion in CaOAl 20 3SiO 2 at 1500°C and 1 GPa , 1996 .

[46]  D. Ames,et al.  Vitric Compositions in the Onaping Formation and Their Relationship to the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Sudbury Structure , 2002 .

[47]  A. J. Naldrett Summary: Development of ideas on Sudbury geology, 1992-1998 , 1999 .

[48]  D. Uhlmann,et al.  The thermal history of the Manicouagan Impact Melt Sheet, Quebec , 1978 .

[49]  M. Avermann,et al.  The formation of the Sudbury Structure, Canada: Toward a unified impact model , 1992 .

[50]  B. Ivanov,et al.  Sudbury impact event: Cratering mechanics and thermal history , 1999 .

[51]  M. Ghiorso,et al.  Multicomponent diffusion in MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 and CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 melts , 1993 .

[52]  J. Crocket,et al.  Isotopic evidence for a single impact melting origin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex , 1999 .

[53]  H. H. Hess STILLWATER IGNEOUS COMPLEX, MONTANA A QUANTITATIVE MINERALOGICAL STUDY , 1960 .

[54]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1952 .

[55]  Gary E. Lofgren,et al.  Effect of Heterogeneous Nucleation on Basaltic Textures: A Dynamic Crystallization Study , 1983 .

[56]  R. Keays,et al.  Geochemical relationships in the Sudbury igneous complex; origin of the main mass and offset dikes , 1997 .

[57]  J. Spray,et al.  Geology, Mineralization, and Emplacement of the Foy Offset Dike, Sudbury Impact Structure , 2002 .

[58]  G. Chai,et al.  Rare-earth element characteristics and origin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario, Canada , 1994 .

[59]  H. Huppert,et al.  Comments on ‘On Convective Style and Vigor in Sheet-like Magma Chambers’ by Bruce D. Marsh , 1991 .

[60]  Bevan M. French,et al.  Traces of Catastrophe: A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures , 1998 .

[61]  H. Taylor,et al.  Generation of Icelandic rhyolites: silicic lavas from the Torfajökull central volcano , 1998 .

[62]  A. Basu,et al.  Origin of the Sudbury Complex by Meteoritic Impact: Neodymium Isotopic Evidence , 1985, Science.

[63]  M. Maxey,et al.  On the distribution and separation of crystals in convecting magma , 1985 .

[64]  R. Lakomy Implications for cratering mechanics from a study of the Footwall Breccia of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada , 1990 .

[65]  H. P. Greenspan,et al.  On hindered settling of particles of different sizes , 1982 .

[66]  I. Mcdougall Differentiation of the great lake dolerite sheet, Tasmania , 1964 .

[67]  Bruce D. Marsh,et al.  Crystal Size Distributions and Scaling Laws in the Quantification of Igneous Textures , 2002 .

[68]  J. D. Fassett,et al.  Re-Os isotope systematics of Ni-Cu sulfide ores, Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario: evidence for a major crustal component , 1991 .

[69]  B. Marsh On the mechanics of igneous diapirism, stoping, and zone melting , 1982 .

[70]  G. Bergantz Underplating and Partial Melting: Implications for Melt Generation and Extraction , 1989, Science.

[71]  E. Stolper A phase diagram for mid-ocean ridge basalts: Preliminary results and implications for petrogenesis , 1980 .

[72]  W. Doherty,et al.  Chemical Evolution and Origin of Nickel Sulfide Mineralization in the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario, Canada , 2001 .

[73]  S. E. Swanson Relation of nucleation and crystal-growth rate to the development of granitic textures , 1977 .

[74]  R. S. James,et al.  The East Bull Lake Intrusive Suite: Remnants of a ~2.48 Ga Large Igneous and Metallogenic Province in the Sudbury Area of the Canadian Shield , 2002 .

[75]  B. Marsh Solidification fronts and magmatic evolution , 1996, Mineralogical Magazine.

[76]  T. C. Phemister A Review of the Problems of the Sudbury Irruptive , 1937, The Journal of geology.

[77]  J. Spray,et al.  Pseudotachylyte petrogenesis: constraints from the Sudbury impact structure , 1996 .

[78]  E. Pattison The Sudbury sublayer , 1979 .

[79]  O. Bachmann,et al.  On the Origin of Crystal-poor Rhyolites: Extracted from Batholithic Crystal Mushes , 2004 .

[80]  J. Bray Shatter Cones at Sudbury , 1966, The Journal of Geology.

[81]  B. Marsh Crystal capture, sorting, and retention in convecting magma , 1988 .

[82]  K. Benn,et al.  Emplacement of Sulfide Deposits in the Copper Cliff Offset Dike during Collapse of the Sudbury Crater Rim: Evidence from Magnetic Fabric Studies , 2002 .

[83]  D. Ames,et al.  Dating of a regional hydrothermal system induced by the 1850 Ma Sudbury impact event , 1998 .

[84]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Fundamentals of rock mechanics , 1969 .

[85]  Bruce D. Marsh,et al.  A magmatic mush column rosetta stone: The McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica , 2004 .

[86]  T. A. Vogel,et al.  Coexisting Acidic and Basic Melts: Geochemistry of a Composite Dike , 1978, The Journal of Geology.

[87]  R. Wiebe,et al.  Magma Mingling in Dikes and Sills , 1997, The Journal of Geology.

[88]  P. Lightfoot,et al.  Geology, Geochemistry, and Mineralogy of the Worthington Offset Dike: A Genetic Model for Offset Dike Mineralization in the Sudbury Igneous Complex , 2002 .

[89]  C. Jaupart,et al.  The stagnant bottom layer of convecting magma chambers , 1986 .

[90]  R. Keays,et al.  Geologic and geochemical relationships between the contact sublayer, inclusions, and the main mass of the Sudbury Igneous Complex; a case study of the Whistle Mine Embayment , 1997 .

[91]  J. Crocket,et al.  Isotopic evidence for distinct crustal sources of North and South Range ores, Sudbury Igneous Complex , 1996 .

[92]  J. Mungall Late-Stage Sulfide Liquid Mobility in the Main Mass of the Sudbury Igneous Complex: Examples from the Victor Deep, McCreedy East, and Trillabelle Deposits , 2002 .

[93]  J. Spray,et al.  Geology, Mineralization, and Emplacement of the Whistle-Parkin Offset Dike, Sudbury , 2002 .

[94]  E. Watson,et al.  Isotope fractionation by chemical diffusion between molten basalt and rhyolite , 2003 .

[95]  D. Walker,et al.  Abyssal tholeiites from the Oceanographer Fracture Zone , 1979 .