Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation

We present a set of case studies in which students create, customize, and personalize their own scientific instruments-and thus become engaged in scientific inquiry not only through observing and measuring but also through designing and building. Although computational technologies have, in general, contributed to making today's scientific instruments more "opaque" (that is, less understandable) and less aesthetically pleasing than their predecessors, we argue that these same technologies can be used to bring back a sense of transparency and aesthetics to the design of scientific instruments. We analyze how students, by building their own scientific instruments, can pursue a broader range of scientific investigations of their own choosing, feel a stronger sense of personal investment in their scientific investigations, and develop deeper critical capacities in evaluating scientific measurements and knowledge.

[1]  David Keith Charlmers MacDonald.  Faraday, Maxwell and Kelvin , 1965 .

[2]  C. Schmitt.  Scientific Revolution , 1968, Nature.

[3]  The Young Scientist , 1969 .

[4]  Maurice Daumas,et al.  Scientific instruments of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and their makers , 1972 .

[5]  Edward C. Warburton,et al.  Teaching technology. , 1978, MD medical newsmagazine.

[6]  Gerard L'Estrange Turner.  Antique Scientific Instruments , 1980 .

[7]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[8]  G. VOURVOPOULOS.  Greek science , 1983, Nature.

[9]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[10]  Patricia Williams,et al.  Design And Technology 5-12 , 1985 .

[11]  Andrew Lugg,et al.  Images of Science , 1988 .

[12]  Roger Fellows,et al.  Images of Science , 1988 .

[13]  Andra A. DiSessa.  Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[14]  Paul Doherty,et al.  The Exploratorium Science Snackbook , 1991 .

[15]  David L. Goodstein,et al.  Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick. 1992. Pantheon Press, New York, NY. 532 pages. ISBN: 0-679-40836-3. $27.50 , 1994 .

[16]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. , 1992 .

[17]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The collaborative visualization project , 1993, CACM.

[18]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Behavior construction kits , 1993, CACM.

[19]  Seymour Papert,et al.  The Children's Machine , 1993 .

[20]  Boris Berenfeld.  Technology and the New Model of Science Education: The Global Lab Experience. , 1994 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[22]  Fred Martin,et al.  Circuits to control--learning engineering by designing LEGO robots , 1994 .

[23]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[24]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[25]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  The Computer Clubhouse: Preparing for Life in a Digital World , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[26]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[27]  Steven Shapin,et al.  The Scientific Revolution , 1997 .

[28]  Robert F. Tinker.  Microcomputer–Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards , 1996, NATO ASI Series.

[29]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[30]  James B. Seaborn,et al.  The Starry Messenger , 1998 .

[31]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Middle tech: blurring the division between high and low tech in education , 1998 .

[32]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .

[33]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with , 1998, CHI.