Chemsex and diagnoses of syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia among men who have sex with men in the UK: a multivariable prediction model using causal inference methodology

Introduction In the last decade diagnoses of most STIs have risen among men who have sex with men (MSM). Although a significant proportion of this is likely due to increased STI screening, understanding the role of behavioural drivers remains critical. We measure the associations between stimulant use to enhance and prolong sexual experiences (chemsex) and bacterial STI diagnoses in UK MSM, individually considering HIV-diagnosed MSM, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users and other MSM. Methods We used the UK 2017–2018 European MSM Internet Survey data (n=9375). We constructed causal inference models using multivariable logistic regression, calculating adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CI of the associations between participation in recent (≤12 months) exclusively dyadic or multipartner chemsex versus no chemsex and recent self-reported diagnoses of syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia. Results Among MSM with an HIV diagnosis, 25% of users indicated recent multipartner chemsex, vs 28% of PrEP users and 5% of other MSM. Adjusting for age, ethnicity, UK birth, cis-trans status, sexual identity, education, settlement size and relationship status, participation in recent multipartner chemsex versus no chemsex was associated with greater odds of recent syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia diagnosis. aORs for recent syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia diagnoses were 2.6 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.1), 3.9 (95% CI 2.6 to 5.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 1.9 to 4.3), respectively, in HIV-diagnosed MSM; 1.9 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.3), 2.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 4.2) and 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.8), respectively, in PrEP users; and 4.0 (95% CI 2.3 to 6.9), 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.8) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.4), respectively, in other MSM. Conversely, exclusively dyadic chemsex had no significant associations with bacterial STI diagnoses among HIV-diagnosed MSM, only gonorrhoea (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7) among PrEP users and syphilis (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6) among other MSM. Discussion Multipartner chemsex may drive the association between chemsex and bacterial STI diagnoses and thus should be the focus of future tailored chemsex interventions. Additionally, PrEP acceptability among MSM and particularly chemsex participants has generated an emergent group suitable for such interventions.

[1]  H. Mohammed,et al.  Factors associated with reporting antibiotic use as STI prophylaxis among HIV PrEP users: findings from a cross-sectional online community survey, May–July 2019, UK , 2020, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[2]  A. Schmidt,et al.  European Men-Who-Have-Sex-With-Men Internet Survey (EMIS-2017): Design and Methods , 2019, Sexuality Research and Social Policy.

[3]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections , 2019, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  M. Gafos,et al.  Chemsex-related drug use and its association with health outcomes in men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional analysis of Antidote clinic service data , 2019, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[5]  C. Mercer,et al.  Association between knowledge, risk behaviours, and testing for sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: findings from a large online survey in the United Kingdom , 2019, HIV medicine.

[6]  C. Free,et al.  Cross-sectional analysis of chemsex drug use and gonorrhoea diagnosis among men who have sex with men in the UK. , 2019, Sexual health.

[7]  C. Mercer,et al.  Awareness of and attitudes to sexually transmissible infections among gay men and other men who have sex with men in England: a qualitative study. , 2019, Sexual health.

[8]  M. Shahmanesh,et al.  Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature. , 2019, The International journal on drug policy.

[9]  C. Kenyon,et al.  Increases in condomless chemsex associated with HIV acquisition in MSM but not heterosexuals attending a HIV testing center in Antwerp, Belgium , 2018, AIDS Research and Therapy.

[10]  R. Berg,et al.  Chemsex among men - a questionnaire study. , 2018, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[11]  W. Whittaker,et al.  Chemsex and new HIV diagnosis in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics , 2018, HIV medicine.

[12]  A. Nardone,et al.  Sexualized drug use (‘chemsex’) and high‐risk sexual behaviours in HIV‐positive men who have sex with men , 2018, HIV medicine.

[13]  F. Hickson Chemsex as edgework: towards a sociological understanding. , 2018, Sexual health.

[14]  H. D. de Vries,et al.  Chemsex Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: a Sexualized Drug Use Survey Among Clients of the Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic and Users of a Gay Dating App in Amsterdam, the Netherlands , 2017, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[15]  R. Giorgetti,et al.  When “Chems” Meet Sex: A Rising Phenomenon Called “ChemSex” , 2017, Current neuropharmacology.

[16]  W. Whittaker,et al.  Chemsex and the city: sexualised substance use in gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics , 2017, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[17]  D. Richardson,et al.  Men who have sex with men diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection are significantly more likely to engage in sexualised drug use , 2017, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[18]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Causal inference—so much more than statistics , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  A. Schmidt,et al.  Illicit drug use among gay and bisexual men in 44 cities: Findings from the European MSM Internet Survey (EMIS). , 2016, The International journal on drug policy.

[20]  A. Nardone,et al.  Sexualised drug use in people attending sexual health clinics in England , 2016, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[21]  S. Torres-Rueda,et al.  Motivations and values associated with combining sex and illicit drugs (‘chemsex’) among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study , 2016, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[22]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparing methods and estimates from probability and convenience sample surveys , 2016, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[23]  G. Melendez‐Torres,et al.  Illicit drug use and its association with sexual risk behaviour among MSM: more questions than answers? , 2016, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[24]  S. Torres-Rueda,et al.  Illicit drug use in sexual settings (‘chemsex’) and HIV/STI transmission risk behaviour among gay men in South London: findings from a qualitative study , 2015, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[25]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Recreational drug use, polydrug use, and sexual behaviour in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: results from the cross-sectional ASTRA study. , 2014, The lancet. HIV.

[26]  T. Kirby,et al.  High-risk drug practices tighten grip on London gay scene , 2013, The Lancet.

[27]  Judea Pearl,et al.  The International Journal of Biostatistics C AUSAL I NFERENCE An Introduction to Causal Inference , 2011 .

[28]  M. Alter,et al.  Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and HIV co-infection. , 2006, Journal of hepatology.