Physical Versus Digital Sticky Notes in Collaborative Ideation

In this paper, we compare the use of physical and digital sticky notes in collaborative ideation. Inspired by a case study in a design company, we focus on a collaborative ideation task, which is often part of pair-wise brainstorming in design. For comparison and to focus on the different materiality, we developed a digital sticky notes setup designed to be as close to the physical setup as possible, not adding any advanced digital features, even though technology has reached a stage where more sophisticated use of digital sticky notes on digital boards is possible. In this paper, we present a study of ideation among pairs of experienced sticky note users. The ideation sessions were video recorded and analyzed to focus on how collaboration is supported across the two setups. Based on quantitative analyses of the participants’ interactions with the artefacts, talking patterns, position and attention during the sessions, we qualify how the differences and similarities between the 2 setups have an impact on note handling, ideation techniques, group dynamics and socio-spatial configuration, e.g. the use of the room, the boards and tables. We conclude that, while the physical setup seems more appropriate for creating notes and posting notes, the digital setup invites more note interaction. Nevertheless, we did not find significant differences in the ideation outcome (e.g., number of notes created) or how participants collaborated between the 2 setups. Hence, we argue that collaborative ideation can successfully be supported in a digital setup as well. Consequently, we believe that the next step in a technological setup is not an either or, but should bring the best of the two worlds together.

[1]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[2]  Michael Argyle,et al.  The central Europe experiment: Looking at persons and looking at objects , 1976 .

[3]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[4]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[5]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design , 1992 .

[6]  William W. Gaver The affordances of media spaces for collaboration , 1992, CSCW '92.

[7]  Preben Holst Mogensen,et al.  Using Artifacts as Triggers for Participatory Analysis , 1992 .

[8]  S. Bødker,et al.  Scenarios as Springboards in Design , 1993 .

[9]  Pierre David Wellner,et al.  Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk , 1993, CACM.

[10]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[11]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings , 1993, INTERCHI.

[13]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[14]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Ariel: augmenting paper engineering drawings , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[15]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying Activity Theory to Video Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  E. Bard,et al.  Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogue , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[18]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Understanding Representation in Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness , 1998, CSCW '98.

[21]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation , 1999, CHI '99.

[23]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site , 2001, UIST '01.

[24]  Jacob Buur,et al.  The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design , 2002, TCHI.

[25]  Klaus B. Bærentsen,et al.  An activity theory approach to affordance , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[26]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Group dynamics and ubiquitous computing , 2002, CACM.

[27]  Timo Engelke,et al.  Towards the Next Generation of Tabletop Gaming Experiences , 2004, Graphics Interface.

[28]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Unpacking collaboration: the interactional organisation of trading in a city dealing room , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Computer Support for Social Awareness in Flexible Work , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Michael Boyle,et al.  PDAs and shared public displays: Making personal information public, and public information personal , 1999, Personal Technologies.

[31]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  Cooperative gestures: multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware , 2006, CHI.

[32]  Frederick Erickson,et al.  Definition and Analysis of Data from Videotape: Some Research Procedures and Their Rationales , 2006 .

[33]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[34]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. , 2006 .

[35]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Organizational Design , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[36]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Intelligent sticky notes that can be searched, located and can send reminders and messages , 2008, IUI '08.

[37]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Process and Pitfalls in Writing Information Visualization Research Papers , 2008, Information Visualization.

[38]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Design issues for supporting collaborative creativity , 2008, COOP.

[39]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Exploring true multi-user multimodal interaction over a digital table , 2008, DIS '08.

[40]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Collaborative Practices that Support Creativity in Design , 2009, ECSCW.

[41]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Being here: designing for distributed hands-on collaboration in blended interaction spaces , 2009, OZCHI.

[42]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts , 2010, CSCW '10.

[43]  David W. Galenson Understanding Creativity , 2010 .

[44]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  AffinityTable - A Hybrid Surface for Supporting Affinity Diagramming , 2011, INTERACT.

[45]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  Designing reality-based interfaces for creative group work , 2011, C&C '11.

[46]  John S. Gero,et al.  Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme , 2011 .

[47]  Nadir Weibel,et al.  ChronoViz: a system for supporting navigation of time-coded data , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Masahiko Inami,et al.  Move-it: interactive sticky notes actuated by shape memory alloys , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[49]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Blended interaction spaces for distributed team collaboration , 2011, TCHI.

[50]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Some Whys and Hows of Experiments in Human-Computer Interaction , 2013, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[51]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  Blended Interaction: understanding natural human–computer interaction in post-WIMP interactive spaces , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[52]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Webstrates: Shareable Dynamic Media , 2015, UIST.

[53]  Gunnar Harboe,et al.  Real-World Affinity Diagramming Practices: Bridging the Paper-Digital Gap , 2015, CHI.

[54]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  Dynamics, Multiplicity and Conceptual Blends in HCI , 2016, CHI.

[55]  Roman Rädle,et al.  When Tablets meet Tabletops: The Effect of Tabletop Size on Around-the-Table Collaboration with Personal Tablets , 2016, CHI.

[56]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Design Tools and Materials in Creative Work , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[57]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Sensitizing Concepts for Socio-spatial Literacy in HCI , 2017, CHI.

[58]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Understanding Creativity Methods in Design , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[59]  D. Newton,et al.  “Comfy” Cars for the “Awesomely Humble”: Exploring Slang and Jargons in a Cross-Cultural Design Process , 2017 .

[60]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Alternating individual and group idea generation: Finding the elusive synergy , 2017 .

[61]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Design {Thinking | Communicating: A Sociogenetic Approach to Reflective Practice in Collaborative Design , 2017 .

[62]  Roman Rädle,et al.  Codestrates: Literate Computing with Webstrates , 2017, UIST.

[63]  Vicente Chulvi,et al.  The effect of information and communication technologies on creativity in collaborative design , 2016, Research in Engineering Design.

[64]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Collaborative Affordances of Medical Records , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[65]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Grouping notes through nodes: The functions of Post-It notes in design team cognition , 2018, Design Studies.

[66]  Roman Rädle,et al.  Remediating a Design Tool: Implications of Digitizing Sticky Notes , 2018, CHI.