Predicting Phase 3 Clinical Trial Results by Modeling Phase 2 Clinical Trial Subject Level Data Using Deep Learning

Predicting Phase 3 clinical trial results is a critical step of Go/No-Go decision making and Phase 3 trial design optimization. To predict the overall treatment effect for patients enrolled into a Phase 3 trial, we propose a framework consisting of two models. First, an individual trough pharmacokinetic concentration (Ctrough) model is developed to predict the trough pharmacokinetic concentration for a potentially new treatment regime planned for Phase 3. Second, an individual treatment effect model is built to model the relationship between patient baseline characteristics, Ctrough and clinical outcomes. These two models are combined together to predict Phase 3 clinical trial results. Since the clinical outcomes to be predicted are longitudinal and the predictors are a mix of time-invariant and timevariant variables, a novel neural network, Residual Semi-Recurrent Neural Network, is developed for both models. The proposed framework is applied in a post-hoc prediction of Phase 3 clinical trial results, and it outperforms the traditional method.

[1]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. I. Michaelis-menten model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data , 1980, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[2]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Sequential Model-Based Optimization for General Algorithm Configuration , 2011, LION.

[4]  Leonid Hanin,et al.  Why statistical inference from clinical trials is likely to generate false and irreproducible results , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[5]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  Walter F. Stewart,et al.  Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks , 2015, MLHC.

[7]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[8]  S. Marshall,et al.  Good Practices in Model‐Informed Drug Discovery and Development: Practice, Application, and Documentation , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[9]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Introduction to PK/PD modelling - with focus on PK and stochastic differential equations , 2008 .

[10]  W. Loh,et al.  REGRESSION TREES WITH UNBIASED VARIABLE SELECTION AND INTERACTION DETECTION , 2002 .

[11]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  D R Mould,et al.  Basic Concepts in Population Modeling, Simulation, and Model-Based Drug Development , 2012, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[13]  R. Harrison,et al.  Phase II and phase III failures: 2013–2015 , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Neural Network Predicted Peak and Trough Gentamicin Concentrations , 1995, Pharmaceutical Research.