Do diabetes-related foot ulcer wound fluid measures have clinical utility as biomarkers for healing? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers reported in wound fluid of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DRFUs), and their ability to reflect current and prospective wound healing. METHOD A systematic search was executed following the PRISMA methodology across five chosen databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Clinical Trials and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Using keywords and phrases, it yielded 5022 results. RESULTS Based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 papers were included in the final analysis, among which: seven reported serial temporal biomarker changes in wounds; six reported measures from baseline and related them to healing rate and/or final healing outcome; four papers reported both end-points, and two papers reported solely on baseline biomarker levels in a generalised diabetic foot ulcer group. Across the studies, a total of 46 distinct markers were described from the wound fluid of n=1141 participants. Biomarkers examined included proteases, protease inhibitors, growth factors, chemokines and cytokines, with proteases being the largest subcategory making up 16 (34.8%) of the markers investigated (n=7). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) was the most frequently investigated protease and it currently holds the most biomarker promise (n=5). Wound bacterial profiles variably related to wound healing outcome (n=5). One study reported biophysical markers rather than biomarkers, including measurement of wound fluid pH. Study quality was generally good. Drawing quantitative comparisons between papers was not possible due to variability in experimental design including sampling and assessment methods. CONCLUSION These studies collectively indicate several wound fluid measures that could identify DRFU status and outcomes, and that methodological standardisation in the field is needed to determine reliable predictive thresholds for healing.

[1]  V. Nube,et al.  Monocyte phenotype as a predictive marker for wound healing in diabetes-related foot ulcers. , 2021, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[2]  M. Hardman,et al.  Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes , 2020, Open Biology.

[3]  B. Larijani,et al.  Beneficial effects of cold atmospheric plasma on inflammatory phase of diabetic foot ulcers; a randomized clinical trial , 2020, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.

[4]  A. Nair,et al.  A Device to Predict Short-Term Healing Outcome of Chronic Wounds , 2020, Advances in wound care.

[5]  Jacquelyn S. Meisel,et al.  Strain- and Species-Level Variation in the Microbiome of Diabetic Wounds Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes and Therapeutic Efficacy. , 2019, Cell host & microbe.

[6]  J. Ahmad,et al.  Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) and ulcer outcome in diabetic patients: Is there any correlation? , 2019, Diabetes & metabolic syndrome.

[7]  Zhongjing Wang,et al.  Wound exudate CXCL6: a potential biomarker for wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers. , 2019, Biomarkers in medicine.

[8]  Punyanuch Jindatanmanusan,et al.  An MMP/TIMP ratio scoring system as a potential predictive marker of diabetic foot ulcer healing. , 2018, Journal of wound care.

[9]  C. Moser,et al.  Uncontrolled gelatin degradation in non-healing chronic wounds. , 2018, Journal of wound care.

[10]  Punyanuch Jindatanmanusan,et al.  Wound Fluid Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 as a Potential Predictive Marker for the Poor Healing Outcome in Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2018, Pathology research international.

[11]  G. Guebitz,et al.  Wound swab and wound biopsy yield similar culture results , 2018, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[12]  Jaynal Abedin,et al.  Monitoring of pH and temperature of neuropathic diabetic and nondiabetic foot ulcers for 12 weeks: An observational study , 2018, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[13]  Z Moore,et al.  Measurement of pH, exudate composition and temperature in wound healing: a systematic review. , 2017, Journal of wound care.

[14]  E. Kogan,et al.  Clinical and morphological characteristics of wound healing in diabetic foot syndrome , 2017 .

[15]  J. Canner,et al.  The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system predicts wound healing but not major amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated in a multidisciplinary setting , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  Bei Wu,et al.  Severity and duration of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) before seeking care as predictors of healing time: A retrospective cohort study , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  Mehdi Ahmadi,et al.  Angiogenic effects of low-intensity cathodal direct current on ischemic diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. , 2017, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[18]  J. Cooke,et al.  Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: the functional role of ROS and emerging ROS‐modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process , 2017, International wound journal.

[19]  J. Davidson,et al.  Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis , 2016, International wound journal.

[20]  T. Phillips,et al.  Wound healing and treating wounds: Differential diagnosis and evaluation of chronic wounds. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  S. Ramsay,et al.  Anti-inflammatory Effects of Clostridial Collagenase Results from In Vitro and Clinical Studies. , 2015, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[22]  R. Frykberg,et al.  Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds , 2015, Advances in wound care.

[23]  E. O’Toole,et al.  Metalloproteinases and Wound Healing. , 2015, Advances in wound care.

[24]  P. Boughton,et al.  Topically Applied Connective Tissue Growth Factor/CCN2 Improves Diabetic Preclinical Cutaneous Wound Healing: Potential Role for CTGF in Human Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing , 2015, Journal of diabetes research.

[25]  V. Driver,et al.  A pilot study evaluating non‐contact low‐frequency ultrasound and underlying molecular mechanism on diabetic foot ulcers , 2014, International wound journal.

[26]  S. Gardner,et al.  Cultures of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Without Clinical Signs of Infection Do Not Predict Outcomes , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[27]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Increased Growth Factors Play a Role in Wound Healing Promoted by Noninvasive Oxygen-Ozone Therapy in Diabetic Patients with Foot Ulcers , 2014, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity.

[28]  F. Gottrup,et al.  Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver treatment , 2013, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[29]  H. Zola,et al.  Cytoskeletal protein Flightless (Flii) is elevated in chronic and acute human wounds and wound fluid: neutralizing its activity in chronic but not acute wound fluid improves cellular proliferation. , 2012, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[30]  T. Joos,et al.  Superficial Wound Swabbing , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[31]  V. Préat,et al.  Lactate stimulates angiogenesis and accelerates the healing of superficial and ischemic wounds in mice , 2012, Angiogenesis.

[32]  Jolene Phair,et al.  A disposable sensor for point of care wound pH monitoring. , 2011, The Analyst.

[33]  J. Potempa,et al.  Comparison of gingival crevicular fluid sampling methods in patients with severe chronic periodontitis. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[34]  H. Northoff,et al.  Wound fluid lactate concentration: a helpful marker for diagnosing soft‐tissue infection in diabetic foot ulcers? Preliminary findings , 2011, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[35]  M Landthaler,et al.  A first prospective randomized controlled trial to decrease bacterial load using cold atmospheric argon plasma on chronic wounds in patients , 2010, The British journal of dermatology.

[36]  V. Nube,et al.  Increased Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Predicts Poor Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Ulcers , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[37]  W. Parks,et al.  Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: regulators of wound healing. , 2008, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[38]  S. Halimi,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinases and diabetic foot ulcers: the ratio of MMP-1 to TIMP-1 is a predictor of wound healing , 2008, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[39]  D. Hough,et al.  Prognostic value of the clinical examination of the diabetic foot ulcer , 1997, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[40]  Joachim Dissemond,et al.  Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? , 2007, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[41]  Lindsay Glynn,et al.  A critical appraisal tool for library and information research , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[42]  I Tarawneh,et al.  A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[43]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Validation of a Diabetic Wound Classification System: The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[44]  B Dewald,et al.  Human chemokines: an update. , 1997, Annual review of immunology.

[45]  D. Greenhalgh.  The role of growth factors in wound healing. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[46]  I. Lamster,et al.  Development of a Biochemical Profile for Gingival Crevicular Fluid: Methodological Considerations and Evaluation of Collagen-Degrading and Ground Substance-Degrading Enzyme Activity during Experimental Gingivitis. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.