40 years of storming: a historical review of Tuckman's model of small group development

This paper presents a historical overview of the Tuckman model describing the stages of group development. Created by Bruce W. Tuckman in 1965 and revised by Tuckman and Mary Ann Conover Jensen in 1977, the model presents the well-known stages of forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. This model has a unique history in that it was initially popular among HRD practitioners and later became common in academic literature as well. Its significance was a reflection of its time, responding both to the growing importance of groups in the workplace and to the lack of applicable research. This paper uses a literature review to trace the history of the model in terms of field practice and academic research.

[1]  Peter R. Scholtes,et al.  The Team Handbook , 2020 .

[2]  E. Jacobson,et al.  A Model of Task Group Development in Complex Organizations and a Strategy of Implementation , 1976 .

[3]  I. Levin.  Facilitating quality improvement team performance: a developmental perspective , 1992 .

[4]  Diane L. Miller,et al.  The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic Team Processes , 2009 .

[5]  J. Hackman.  Why Teams Don’t Work , 1998 .

[6]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  S. Wheelan.  Group development and the practice of group psychotherapy. , 1997 .

[8]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[9]  L. Offermann,et al.  The Science and Practice of Team Development: Improving the Link , 2001 .

[10]  B. Tuckman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE, GROUP COMPOSITION, AND GROUP FUNCTIONING , 1964 .

[11]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Creative Leadership Processes in Project Team Development: An Alternative to Tuckman's Stage Model , 2000 .

[12]  Glenn M. Parker,et al.  Team Players and Teamwork: The New Competitive Business Strategy , 1990 .

[13]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  J. Barry Jacobs,et al.  Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices , 1975 .

[15]  Philip J. Runkel,et al.  Stages of Group Development: An Empirical Test of Tuckman's Hypothesis , 1971 .

[16]  G. Neuman,et al.  Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  L. Dyer,et al.  Right from the Start: Exploring the Effects of Early Team Events on Subsequent Project Team Development and Performance , 2004 .

[18]  T. Janoski.  Review of Marvin R. Weisbord, Productive Workplaces: Organizing and Managing for Dignity, Meaning, and Community (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987) , 1989 .

[19]  N. Gottlieb,et al.  Developmental Stages in Public Health Partnerships: A Practical Perspective , 2005, Health promotion practice.

[20]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[21]  Harvey Robbins,et al.  Why Teams Don't Work , 1995 .

[22]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[24]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[25]  S. Wheelan.  An initial exploration of the internal dynamics of leadership teams. , 2003 .

[26]  K. Cassidy,et al.  Tuckman Revisited: Proposing a New Model of Group Development for Practitioners , 2007 .