An axisymmetric model for Taylor impact test and estimation of metal plasticity

The impact of a flat-ended cylindrical rod onto a rigid stationary anvil, often known as the Taylor impact test, is studied. An axisymmetric model is developed to capture the deformation behaviour of the rod after impact. The most distinctive feature of the proposed model is that it takes into account the spatial and temporal variation of both longitudinal and radial deformation and consequently the strains and strain rates. The final deformed shapes and time histories of different field variables, as obtained from the model, are found to be in good agreement with corresponding experimental and numerical results reported in the literature. The proposed model is then used to formulate an inverse framework to estimate the Johnson–Cook constitutive parameters. In the inverse formulation, the objective function is constructed using the final deformed length and diameter at the impact end of the retrieved rod. Finally, the potential of the proposed model in estimating material parameters is illustrated through some examples.

[1]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[2]  R. Armstrong Bertram Hopkinson's pioneering work and the dislocation mechanics of high rate deformations and mechanically induced detonations , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation on the deformation and failure behavior in the Taylor test , 2011 .

[4]  Debasish Roy,et al.  A pseudo-dynamical systems approach to a class of inverse problems in engineering , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  William G. Proud,et al.  Symmetrical Taylor impact studies of copper , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Tuğrul Özel,et al.  Identification of Constitutive Material Model Parameters for High-Strain Rate Metal Cutting Conditions Using Evolutionary Computational Algorithms , 2007 .

[7]  D. Radford,et al.  Shock induced void nucleation during Taylor impact , 2005 .

[8]  A. Corigliano,et al.  Parameter identification in explicit structural dynamics: performance of the extended Kalman filter , 2004 .

[9]  Joseph C. Foster,et al.  An engineering analysis of plastic wave propagation in the Taylor test , 1997 .

[10]  Peter P. Gillis,et al.  Estimation of flow stress under high rate plastic deformation , 1995 .

[11]  Charles E. Anderson,et al.  A TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL FOR LONG-ROD PENETRATION* , 1995 .

[12]  B. J. Baxter,et al.  An experimental and analytical study of the Taylor impact test , 1994 .

[13]  R. Woodward,et al.  Failure mechanisms in impacting penetrators , 1992, Journal of Materials Science.

[14]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of cylinder‐impact test data for constitutive model constants , 1988 .

[15]  P. Gillis,et al.  Some further results on the Taylor impact test , 1987 .

[16]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations , 1987 .

[17]  P. Gillis,et al.  On the equation of motion of the undeformed section of a Taylor impact specimen , 1987 .

[18]  J. B. Hawkyard,et al.  A theory for the mushrooming of flat-ended projectiles impinging on a flat rigid anvil, using energy considerations , 1969 .

[19]  J. Hawkyard,et al.  The mean dynamic yield strength of copper and low carbon steel at elevated temperatures from measurements of the “mushrooming” of flat-ended projectiles , 1968 .

[20]  W. E. Carrington,et al.  The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress III. Changes in microstructure caused by deformation under impact at high-striking velocities , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[21]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress I. Theoretical considerations , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  A. C. Whiffin The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress - II. Tests on various metallic materials , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[23]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  Response of metallic cylindrical sandwich shells subjected to projectile impact—Experimental investigations , 2014 .

[24]  L. C. Forde,et al.  The use of symmetric Taylor impact to validate constitutive models for an fcc metal (copper) and a bcc alloy (RHA steel) , 2009 .

[25]  G. M. Zhang,et al.  Modified Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (MSPH) basis functions for meshless methods, and their application to axisymmetric Taylor impact test , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Coupled Plastic Wave Propagation and Column Buckling , 2005 .

[27]  P. Schulz,et al.  Design and Use of Light-Weight Materials , 2005 .

[28]  C. H. Kim,et al.  EFFECT OF VISCOPLASTIC FLOW RULES ON THE INITIATION AND GROWTH OF SHEAR BANDS AT HIGH STRAIN RATES , 2002 .

[29]  William K. Rule,et al.  An elementary theory for the Taylor impact test , 1998 .

[30]  E. Voce,et al.  The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformations , 1948 .

[31]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The Latent Energy Remaining in a Metal after Cold Working , 1934 .