A New Calibration Methodology for Thorax and Upper Limbs Motion Capture in Children Using Magneto and Inertial Sensors

Recent advances in wearable sensor technologies for motion capture have produced devices, mainly based on magneto and inertial measurement units (M-IMU), that are now suitable for out-of-the-lab use with children. In fact, the reduced size, weight and the wireless connectivity meet the requirement of minimum obtrusivity and give scientists the possibility to analyze children's motion in daily life contexts. Typical use of magneto and inertial measurement units (M-IMU) motion capture systems is based on attaching a sensing unit to each body segment of interest. The correct use of this setup requires a specific calibration methodology that allows mapping measurements from the sensors' frames of reference into useful kinematic information in the human limbs' frames of reference. The present work addresses this specific issue, presenting a calibration protocol to capture the kinematics of the upper limbs and thorax in typically developing (TD) children. The proposed method allows the construction, on each body segment, of a meaningful system of coordinates that are representative of real physiological motions and that are referred to as functional frames (FFs). We will also present a novel cost function for the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, to retrieve the rotation matrices between each sensor frame (SF) and the corresponding FF. Reported results on a group of 40 children suggest that the method is repeatable and reliable, opening the way to the extensive use of this technology for out-of-the-lab motion capture in children.

[1]  C. Von Hofsten An action perspective on motor development. , 2004, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[2]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  A spot check for assessing static orientation consistency of inertial and magnetic sensing units. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[3]  R. Boyd,et al.  Upper limb activity measures for 5‐ to 16‐year‐old children with congenital hemiplegia: a systematic review , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[4]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Inertial-Magnetic Sensors for Assessing Spatial Cognition in Infants , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  Estimating Three-Dimensional Orientation of Human Body Parts by Inertial/Magnetic Sensing , 2011, Sensors.

[6]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  P H Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of arm orientation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Embedding inertial-magnetic sensors in everyday objects: assessing spatial cognition in children. , 2012, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[9]  F. Keller,et al.  Sensor-based technology in the study of motor skills in infants at risk for ASD , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[10]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[11]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Beyond the standard clinical rating scales: Fine-grained assessment of post-stroke motor functionality using wearable inertial sensors , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Adriano Ferrari,et al.  ‘Outwalk’: a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  Ronald V. Croce,et al.  Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  P. Raina,et al.  Improved scaling of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy: evidence of reliability and validity. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[15]  Laura Rocchi,et al.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  J. Stuelpnagel,et al.  A Least Squares Estimate of Satellite Attitude (Grace Wahba) , 1966 .

[17]  P. Bonato,et al.  Wearable sensors/systems and their impact on biomedical engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[18]  J. Duhamel,et al.  Differential effects of parietal and frontal inactivations on reaction times distributions in a visual search task , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[19]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Advances in wearable technology and applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  C. Von Hofsten,et al.  Perception-action in children with ASD , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[21]  Domenico Formica,et al.  An experimental protocol for the definition of upper limb anatomical frames on children using magneto-inertial sensors , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[22]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2nd ed) , 2003 .

[23]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  G R Johnson,et al.  A framework for the definition of standardized protocols for measuring upper-extremity kinematics. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  Greg Welch,et al.  Motion Tracking: No Silver Bullet, but a Respectable Arsenal , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[26]  Virginia Volterra,et al.  Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.