MIROC6 Large Ensemble (MIROC6-LE): experimental design and initial analyses

. Single model initial-condition large ensembles (LEs) are a useful approach to understand roles of forced responses and internal variability in historical and future climate change. Here, we produce one of the largest ensembles thus far using the MIROC6 coupled atmosphere-ocean global climate model (MIROC6-LE). The total experimental period of MIROC6-LE is longer than 76000 years. MIROC6-LE consists of a long preindustrial control run, 50-member historical simulations, 8 single forcing historical experiments with 10 or 50 members, 5 future scenario experiments with 50 members and 3 single 15 forcing future experiments with 50 members. Here, we describe the experimental design. The output data of most of the experiments are freely available to the public. This dataset would be useful to a wide range of research communities. We also demonstrate some examples of initial analyses. Specifically, we confirm that the linear additivity of the forcing-response relationship holds for the 1850-2020 trends of the annual mean values and extreme indices of surface air temperature and precipitation by analyzing historical fully forced runs and the sum of single forced historical runs. To isolate historical 20 anthropogenic signals of annual mean and extreme temperature for 2000-2020 relative to 1850-1900, ensemble sizes of 4 and 15, respectively, are sufficient in most of the world. Historical anthropogenic signals of annual mean and extreme precipitation are significant with the 50-member ensembles in 76% and 69% of the world, respectively. Fourteen members are sufficient to examine differences in changes in annual mean values and extreme indices of temperature and precipitation between the shared socioeconomic pathways (ssp), ssp585 and ssp126, in most of the world. Ensembles larger than 50 members are desirable for 25 investigations of differences in annual mean and extreme precipitation changes between ssp126 and ssp119. Historical and future changes in internal variability, represented by departures from the ensemble mean, are analyzed with a focus on the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and global annual mean temperature and precipitation. An ensemble size of 31 is large enough to detect ENSO intensification from preindustrial conditions to 1951-2000, from 1951-2000 to 2051-2100 in all future experiments, and from low- to high-emission future scenario experiments. The single forcing historical 30 experiments with 27 members can isolate ENSO intensification due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas and aerosol forcings. Future changes in the global mean temperature variability are discernible with 23 members under all future experiments, while 50 members are not sufficient for detecting changes in the global mean precipitation variability in ssp119 and ssp126. We also confirm that these temperature and precipitation variabilities are not precisely analyzed when detrended anomalies from the long-term averages are used due to interannual climate responses to the historical natural forcing, which highlights the 35 importance of large ensembles for assessing internal variability.

[1]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Attribution of multi-annual to decadal changes in the climate system: The Large Ensemble Single Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (LESFMIP) , 2022, Frontiers in Climate.

[2]  P. Lin,et al.  The Super-large Ensemble Experiments of CAS FGOALS-g3 , 2022, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.

[3]  H. Shiogama,et al.  Emergent constraints on future precipitation changes , 2022, Nature.

[4]  E. Guilyardi,et al.  Robust Evaluation of ENSO in Climate Models: How Many Ensemble Members Are Needed? , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[5]  E. Moyer,et al.  Robust decrease in El Niño/Southern Oscillation amplitude under long-term warming , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[6]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Ubiquity of human-induced changes in climate variability , 2021, Earth System Dynamics.

[7]  E. Guilyardi,et al.  Evaluating Climate Models with the CLIVAR 2020 ENSO Metrics Package , 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[8]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[9]  R. Betts,et al.  Method Uncertainty Is Essential for Reliable Confidence Statements of Precipitation Projections , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[10]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Enhanced warming constrained by past trends in equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature gradient , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[11]  C. Deser,et al.  Pattern Recognition Methods to Separate Forced Responses from Internal Variability in Climate Model Ensembles and Observations , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[12]  H. Fredriksen,et al.  How Does El Niño–Southern Oscillation Change Under Global Warming—A First Look at CMIP6 , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[13]  Michiya Hayashi,et al.  Dynamics for El Niño-La Niña asymmetry constrain equatorial-Pacific warming pattern , 2020, Nature Communications.

[14]  J. Fasullo Evaluating simulated climate patterns from the CMIP archives using satellite and reanalysis datasets using the Climate Model Assessment Tool (CMATv1) , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[15]  C. Deser,et al.  Isolating the Evolving Contributions of Anthropogenic Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases: A New CESM1 Large Ensemble Community Resource , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[16]  H. Shiogama,et al.  Scalability of future climate changes across Japan examined with large-ensemble simulations at + 1.5 K, +2 K, and + 4 K global warming levels , 2020, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.

[17]  H. Shiogama,et al.  Historical and future anthropogenic warming effects on droughts, fires and fire emissions of CO2 and PM2.5 in equatorial Asia when 2015-like El Niño events occur , 2020, Earth System Dynamics.

[18]  C. Deser,et al.  Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6 , 2020, Earth System Dynamics.

[19]  N. Maher,et al.  How large does a large ensemble need to be? , 2019, Earth System Dynamics.

[20]  E. Fischer,et al.  Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will lower increases in inequalities of four hazard indicators of climate change , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[21]  B. Samset,et al.  Anthropogenic aerosol forcing under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[22]  B. Stevens,et al.  The Max Planck Institute Grand Ensemble: Enabling the Exploration of Climate System Variability , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[23]  D. Stone,et al.  Experiment design of the International CLIVAR C20C+ Detection and Attribution project , 2019, Weather and Climate Extremes.

[24]  S. Watanabe,et al.  Precipitation Changes in a Climate With 2‐K Surface Warming From Large Ensemble Simulations Using 60‐km Global and 20‐km Regional Atmospheric Models , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[25]  J. Marotzke,et al.  ENSO Change in Climate Projections: Forced Response or Internal Variability? , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[26]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[27]  A. Timmermann,et al.  El Niño–Southern Oscillation complexity , 2018, Nature.

[28]  Kenji Tanaka,et al.  Over 5,000 years of ensemble future climate simulations by 60-km global and 20-km regional atmospheric models , 2017 .

[29]  A. Fedorov,et al.  The extreme El Niño of 2015–2016 and the end of global warming hiatus , 2017 .

[30]  M. Kimoto,et al.  Recent Enhanced Seasonal Temperature Contrast in Japan from Large Ensemble High-Resolution Climate Simulations , 2017 .

[31]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0)contribution to CMIP6 , 2016 .

[32]  Paul Charbonneau,et al.  Solar Forcing for CMIP6 (v3.1) , 2016 .

[33]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[34]  K.,et al.  The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability , 2015 .

[35]  G. Bala,et al.  Effects of large-scale deforestation on precipitation in the monsoon regions: Remote versus local effects , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  G. Hegerl,et al.  The global precipitation response to volcanic eruptions in the CMIP5 models , 2014 .

[37]  Masahiro Watanabe,et al.  Contribution of natural decadal variability to global warming acceleration and hiatus , 2014 .

[38]  Agus Santoso,et al.  Response of El Niño sea surface temperature variability to greenhouse warming , 2014 .

[39]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Inferred changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation variance over the past six centuries , 2013 .

[40]  P. Stott,et al.  Anthropogenic impact on Earth's hydrological cycle , 2013 .

[41]  Toru Nozawa,et al.  On the linear additivity of climate forcing‐response relationships at global and continental scales , 2013 .

[42]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change , 2011 .

[43]  S. Emori,et al.  Emission Scenario Dependency of Precipitation on Global Warming in the MIROC3.2 Model , 2010 .

[44]  S. Emori,et al.  Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle , 2010 .

[45]  S. Emori,et al.  Precipitation extreme changes exceeding moisture content increases in MIROC and IPCC climate models , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  John M. Wallace,et al.  Identifying Signatures of Natural Climate Variability in Time Series of Global-Mean Surface Temperature: Methodology and Insights , 2009 .

[47]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  The Definition of El Niño. , 1997 .

[48]  L. Sayadi,et al.  Abstract , 1897, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[49]  J. Cole WHAT IS “ ENSO DIVERSITY ” ? , 2018 .

[50]  K. Calvin,et al.  Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways , 2017 .

[51]  D. Stone,et al.  Attributing Historical Changes in Probabilities of Record-Breaking Daily Temperature and Precipitation Extreme Events , 2016 .

[52]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[53]  C. Turley Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2010 .