NOVEL METHOD FOR ANALYZING SNELLEN VISUAL ACUITY MEASUREMENTS

Purpose: Most retrospective reviews convert Snellen visual acuity measurements obtained during routine clinic visits to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units so that statistical manipulations can be performed. However, visual acuity measurements expressed as logMAR units are not intuitively interpretable by clinicians. A more intuitive approach is presented here which uses the conversion of Snellen visual acuity fractions to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores for statistical manipulations. Methods: Snellen visual acuity measurements were converted to approximate ETDRS (approxETDRS) letter scores for statistical manipulations and then converted back to Snellen equivalent fractions. The formula to convert Snellen visual acuity measurements to approxETDRS letter scores is 85 + 50 × log (Snellen fraction), which may be rounded to the nearest letter. Results: A linear relationship exists between true ETDRS letter scores, approxETDRS letter scores, and logMAR units. The interconversion between Snellen visual acuity measurements, logMAR units, and approxETDRS letter scores was prepared in a tabular form for easy reference. The same outcomes (in Snellen fractions) were obtained with statistical manipulation of either approxETDRS letter scores or logMAR conversions. Conclusion: Conversion of Snellen visual acuity fractions to approxETDRS letter scores for the purpose of performing statistical manipulations provides more readily interpretable outcomes compared with the current strategy of converting Snellen visual acuity fractions to logMAR units.

[1]  N. Bressler,et al.  Visual acuity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of retinal diseases. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Holladay,et al.  Visual acuity measurements. , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Christoph Kniestedt,et al.  Visual acuity and its measurement. , 2003, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[4]  Chris A Johnson,et al.  A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  B. Hawkins,et al.  Measurement and analysis of visual acuity in multicenter randomized clinical trials in the United States: Findings from a survey , 2003, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[6]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Rabbetts,et al.  Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[8]  M Sheridan,et al.  The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti‐cataract formulation trials , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  B. Wick,et al.  A comparison of the Snellen chart and the S-chart for visual acuity assessment in amblyopia. , 1984, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[10]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  H F Sanderson,et al.  Observer variation in ophthalmology. , 1980, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[14]  L L SLOAN,et al.  New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. , 1996, Ophthalmology.