The 15-D Measure of Health Related Quality of Life . II Feasibility , Reliability and Validity of its Valuation System

The 15D is a generic, 15-dimensional, standardised, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), that can be used as a profile and single index score measure. This paper introduces alternative valuation models based on the multi-attribute utility theory for generating the single index scores, and examines their feasibility, reliability and validity by using several data sets and methods. Valuations were elicited from several representative samples of Finnish adult population by using rating scales in self-administered questionnaires and postal survey. The approach proved to be feasible and produced valuations with a high reliability. There is solid convergent evidence of construct validity for the index scores generated by additive 2-stage or 3stage valuation models. Tests for reflective equilibrium provided strong evidence that these scores exhibit a more plausible trade-off between length and quality of life than some other single index score measures (EuroQol, QWB, McMaster), and are thus more valid for QALY calculations in cost-utility analysis. The values are consistent and quite likely widely generalisable and usable at least in Western-type societies. The 15D is thus probably the most sensitive and comprehensive HRQOL measure presently available that combines the advantages of a profile and single index score measure with a high level of reliability and validity. The 15-D Measure of Health Related Quality of Life. II Feasibility, Reliability and Validity of its Valuation System

[1]  G. Torrance Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Richardson,et al.  Social Evaluation of Health Care Versus Personal Evaluation of Health States: Evidence on the Validity of Four Health-state Scaling Instruments Using Norwegian and Australian Surveys , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  E. Nord The Person-trade-off Approach to Valuing Health Care Programs , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  H. Sintonen An approach to measuring and valuing health states. , 1981, Social science & medicine. Medical economics.

[6]  E. Nord,et al.  Methods for quality adjustment of life years. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[7]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques , 1976 .

[8]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[9]  R. Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--II: Scaling methods. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  D L Patrick,et al.  Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. , 1973, Health services research.

[12]  G. Torrance,et al.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  H. Sintonen,et al.  A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications , 1993 .

[14]  G. Torrance Multi-attribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system , 1992 .

[15]  G. Loomes,et al.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[16]  A. Mehrez,et al.  Quality-adjusted Life Years, Utility Theory, and Healthy-years Equivalents , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  P. Dolan,et al.  Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[18]  C. Gudex,et al.  Comparing scaling methods for health state valuations - Rosser revisited , 1993 .

[19]  E. Nord,et al.  The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. , 1991, The International journal of health planning and management.

[20]  A. Mehrez,et al.  An empirical evaluation of two assessment methods for utility measurement for life years , 1987 .

[21]  J. Olsen,et al.  Time preferences for health gains: an empirical investigation. , 1993, Health economics.

[22]  I. Wiklund,et al.  Cross-cultural variation in the weighting of health statements: A comparison of English and Swedish valuations , 1987 .

[23]  J. Richardson,et al.  Cost utility analysis: what should be measured? , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[24]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[25]  P. Kind,et al.  A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? , 1978, International journal of epidemiology.

[26]  M. Bullinger Indices versus profiles — advantages and disadvantages , 1993 .