Normative and Descriptive Models of Military Decisions to Deploy Precision Strike Capabilities

Precision strike capabilities represent a significant and highly controversial part of present day military operations. And yet, there is a surprising dearth of empirical research on military decision making in this domain. In this article, we therefore review different psychological perspectives on how these decisions can be made. Specifically, we compare the application of normative models of judgment and choice against the empirical research on human decision making, which suggests that people are more likely to employ heuristic strategies. We suggest that several features of decision tasks in the precision strike domain evoke the use of intuitive (heuristic) decision making whereas other features such as the sometimes unfamiliar (or novel) nature of the decision task requires analytic strategies to generate good solutions. Therefore, decisions about precision strike capabilities are best made with a mixture of intuitive and analytic thought, a mode of thinking known as quasirationality.

[1]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .

[2]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[3]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Expert intuitions: how to model the decision strategies of airport customs officers? , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  On avoiding framing effects in experienced decision makers , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Mary E. Thomson,et al.  On the relevance of Cognitive Continuum Theory and quasirationality for understanding management judgment and decision making , 2012 .

[6]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Forecasted risk taking in youth: evidence for a bounded-rationality perspective , 2012, Synthese.

[7]  Randy Huiss,et al.  Proliferation of Precision Strike: Issues for Congress , 2012 .

[8]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Crime as risk taking , 2012 .

[9]  M. Brand,et al.  Decision making under stress: A selective review , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[10]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Simply Criminal: Predicting Burglars’ Occupancy Decisions with a Simple Heuristic , 2011, Law and human behavior.

[11]  T. Mahnken.  Weapons: The Growth & Spread of the Precision-Strike Regime , 2011, Daedalus.

[12]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Pictures speak louder than numbers: on communicating medical risks to immigrants with limited non‐native language proficiency , 2011, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[13]  B. Strawser.  Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles , 2010 .

[14]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  A. Banks,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizations: Reviewing Pragmatic Science , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Leonard.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 2006 .

[17]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[18]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making , 2003, Psychological science.

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[20]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Fast and frugal versus regression models of human judgement , 2001 .

[21]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[22]  A. Bröder.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  K. R. Hammond.  Judgments Under Stress , 1999 .

[24]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  Information dimension, information overload and decision quality , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[25]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Michael E. Doherty,et al.  Social judgement theory , 1996 .

[27]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[28]  C. M. Jagacinski.  Evaluation of job candidates with missing information: Effects of attribute importance and interattribute correlation , 1994 .

[29]  P. Anand,et al.  Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk. , 1993 .

[30]  W. Edwards.  Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications , 1992 .

[31]  P. Kline.  Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[32]  P. Fishburn.  Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories , 1981 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Decision, probability, and utility: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[36]  Kerstin M. Mueller,et al.  Judgment And Decision Making As A Skill Learning Development And Evolution , 2016 .

[37]  Shooting to Kill: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Use of Lethal Force , 2012 .

[38]  Adrian P. Banks,et al.  Distributed Mental Models: Mental Models in Distributed Cognitive Systems , 2009 .

[39]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[40]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[41]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[42]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell? , 1999 .

[43]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[44]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[45]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[46]  J. Pligt.  Subjective Expected Utility , 1995 .

[47]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[48]  A. M. Harrell,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INFORMATION LOAD ON DECISION MAKERS' CUE UTILIZATION LEVELS AND DECISION QUALITY IN... , 1990 .

[49]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  Jeffrey E. Danes,et al.  Social Judgment Theory , 1984 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[52]  W. Edwards.  Behavioral decision theory. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.1575 Information Search in Heuristic Decision Making , 2022 .

[54]  Journal of Behavioral Decision Making J. Behav. Dec. Making, 14: 141±168 �2001) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.371 Bailing and Jailing the Fast and Frugal Way , 2022 .