Conjugate-plane photometry: reducing scintillation in ground-based photometry

High-precision fast photometry from ground-based observatories is a challenge due to intensity fluctuations (scintillation) produced by the Earth's atmosphere. Here we describe a method to reduce the effects of scintillation by a combination of pupil reconjugation and calibration using a comparison star. Because scintillation is produced by high-altitude turbulence, the range of angles over which the scintillation is correlated is small and therefore simple correction by a comparison star is normally impossible. We propose reconjugating the telescope pupil to a high dominant layer of turbulence, then apodizing it before calibration with a comparison star. We find by simulation that given a simple atmosphere with a single high-altitude turbulent layer and a strong surface layer, a reduction in the intensity variance by a factor of ∼30 is possible. Given a more realistic atmosphere as measured by Scintillation Detection and Ranging (SCIDAR) at San Pedro Martir, we find that on a night with a strong high-altitude layer we can expect the median variance to be reduced by a factor of ∼11. By reducing the scintillation noise we will be able to detect much smaller changes in brightness. If we assume a 2-m telescope and an exposure time of 30 s, a reduction in the scintillation noise from 0.78 to 0.21 mmag is possible, which will enable the routine detection of, for example, the secondary transits of extrasolar planets from the ground.

[1]  David Charbonneau,et al.  Detection of Thermal Emission from an Extrasolar Planet , 2005 .

[2]  Mercedes Lopez-Morales,et al.  Ground-based secondary eclipse detection of the very-hot Jupiter OGLE-TR-56b , 2009 .

[3]  Lennart Lindegren,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC INTENSITY SCINTILLATION OF STARS, I. STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS AND TEMPORAL PROPERTIES , 1997 .

[4]  T. Brown,et al.  Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star , 1999, The Astrophysical journal.

[5]  Lennart Lindegren,et al.  Atmospheric Intensity Scintillation of Stars. III. Effects for Different Telescope Apertures , 1998 .

[6]  S. Seager,et al.  Light and shadow from distant worlds , 2009, Nature.

[7]  R. P. Butler,et al.  A Transiting “51 Peg-like” Planet , 2000, The Astrophysical journal.

[8]  Jean Vernin,et al.  Generalized Sciadr measurements at San Pedro martir : II wind profiles statistics , 2006 .

[9]  E. Ofek,et al.  A single sub-kilometre Kuiper belt object from a stellar occultation in archival data , 2009, Nature.

[10]  M. Langlois,et al.  Multiconjugate adaptive optics: laboratory experience. , 2004, Optics express.

[11]  Chile,et al.  Atmospheric Scintillation at Dome C, Antarctica: Implications for Photometryand Astrometry , 2006, astro-ph/0604538.

[12]  Michel Tallon,et al.  Focusing on a Turbulent Layer: Principle of the “Generalized SCIDAR” , 1998 .

[13]  Amokrane Berdja,et al.  Near-ground turbulence profiles from lunar scintillometer , 2010 .

[14]  David Charbonneau,et al.  A map of the day–night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Mark Chun,et al.  Mauna Kea ground-layer characterization campaign , 2009 .

[16]  Timothy Butterley,et al.  Profiling the surface layer of optical turbulence with SLODAR , 2010 .

[17]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[18]  Jean Vernin,et al.  Generalized SCIDAR Measurements at San Pedro Mártir. II. Wind Profile Statistics , 2006 .

[19]  Lennart Lindegren,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC INTENSITY SCINTILLATION OF STARS. II. DEPENDENCE ON OPTICAL WAVELENGTH , 1997 .

[20]  P. J. Wheatley,et al.  High-precision photometry by telescope defocussing. I. The transiting planetary system WASP-5 , 2009, 0903.2139.