MACROINVERTEBRATE RESPONSE TO FLOW CHANGES IN A SUBALPINE STREAM: PREDICTIONS FROM TWO‐DIMENSIONAL HYDRODYNAMIC MODELS

Two-dimensional hydrodynamic models are being used increasingly as alternatives to traditional one-dimensional instream flow methodologies for assessing adequacy of flow and associated faunal habitat. Two-dimensional modelling of habitat has focused primarily on fishes, but fish-based assessments may not model benthic macroinvertebrate habitat effectively. We extend two-dimensional techniques to a macroinvertebrate assemblage in a high-elevation stream in the Sierra Nevada (Dana Fork of the Tuolumne River, Yosemite National Park, CA, USA). This stream frequently flows at less than 0.03m 3 s � 1 in late summer and is representative of a common water abstraction scenario: maximum water abstraction coinciding with seasonally low flows. We used two-dimensional modelling to predict invertebrate responses to reduced flows that might result from increased abstraction. We collected site-specific field data on the macroinvertebrate assemblage, bed topography and flow conditions and then coupled a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model with macroinvertebrate indices to evaluate habitat across a range of low flows. Macroinvertebrate indices were calculated for the wetted area at each flow. A surrogate flow record based on an adjacent watershed was used to evaluate frequency and duration of low flow events. Using surrogate historical records, we estimated that flow should fall below 0.071m 3 s � 1 at least 1day in 82 of 95years and below 0.028m 3 s � 1 in 48 of 95years. Invertebrate metric means indicated minor losses in response to modelled discharge reductions, but wetted area decreased substantially. Responses of invertebrates to water

[1]  Terry J. Waddle,et al.  Field evaluation of a two‐dimensional hydrodynamic model near boulders for habitat calculation , 2009 .

[2]  Maria Teresa Ferreira,et al.  Macroinvertebrate community structure in a regulated river segment with different flow conditions , 2002 .

[3]  B. Biggs,et al.  Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function , 2005 .

[4]  G. Minshall,et al.  The Effect of Reduction in Stream Flow on Invertebrate Drift , 1968 .

[5]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[6]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  STREAMFLOW CHANGES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA, SIMULATED USING A STATISTICALLY DOWNSCALED GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL SCENARIO OF CLIMATE CHANGE , 2000 .

[7]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  The biology of streams and rivers , 1998 .

[8]  J. Gore,et al.  Predictive Models of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Density for Use in Instream Flow Studies and Regulated Flow Management , 1981 .

[9]  C. Holmquist-Johnson Numerical analysis of river spanning rock U-weirs : evaluating effects of structure geometry on local hydraulics , 2011 .

[10]  J. Giudicelli,et al.  Impact of the residual flow on the physical characteristics and benthic community (algae, invertebrates) of a regulated Mediterranean river: the Durance, France , 1999 .

[11]  Göran Englund,et al.  EFFECTS OF FLOW REGULATION, HABITAT AREA AND ISOLATION ON THE MACROINVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF RAPIDS IN NORTH SWEDISH RIVERS , 1996 .

[12]  T. Waddle PHABSIM for Windows User's Manual and Exercises , 2001 .

[13]  J. B. Pearson,et al.  Methodology in Social Research. , 1968 .

[14]  K. Collier Flow preferences of larval Chironomidae (Diptera) in Tongariro River, New Zealand , 1993 .

[15]  J. Richardson,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates in a New Zealand river and the development of in‐stream flow‐habitat models for Deleatidium spp. , 1990 .

[16]  Donald J. Orth,et al.  Habitat Use by an Assemblage of Fish in a Large Warmwater Stream , 1991 .

[17]  J. Gore,et al.  Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: A role in stream management and restoration , 2001 .

[18]  M. Benbow,et al.  Effects of stream diversion on riffle macroinvertebrate communities in a Maui, Hawaii, stream , 2002 .

[19]  James A. Gore,et al.  An analysis of artificial riffles and enhancement of benthic community diversity by physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) and direct observation , 1998 .

[20]  G. Petts,et al.  The influence of drought on chalk stream macroinvertebrates , 1999 .

[21]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Properties of the Rarefaction Diversity Measurement , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[22]  M. Mosley Variability of water temperatures in the braided Ashley and Rakaia rivers , 1983 .

[23]  B. B. Yoshioka,et al.  High Dams and Marine‐Freshwater Linkages: Effects on Native and Introduced Fauna in the Caribbean , 1998 .

[24]  M. Dettinger,et al.  Changes in Snowmelt Runoff Timing in Western North America under a `Business as Usual' Climate Change Scenario , 2004 .

[25]  A. Panorska,et al.  Assessing possible visitor-use impacts on water quality in Yosemite National Park, California , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[26]  Michael T. Barbour,et al.  Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: Metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites , 1992 .

[27]  S. Hurlbert The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[28]  Dilip Mathur,et al.  A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology , 1985 .

[29]  K. Cummins,et al.  An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1981 .

[30]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .

[31]  T. Wesche,et al.  Status of Instream Flow Legislation and Practices in North America , 1989 .

[32]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Experiments in Ecology. , 1997 .

[33]  R. Death,et al.  Invertebrate community responses to experimentally reduced discharge in small streams of different water quality , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[34]  E. Maurer Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California, under two emissions scenarios , 2007 .

[35]  Geraldine R. Vale,et al.  Time and the Tuolumne Landscape: Continuity and Change in the Yosemite High Country , 1994 .

[36]  E. A. Greathouse,et al.  Conservation and management of migratory fauna: dams in tropical streams of Puerto Rico , 2006 .

[37]  E. Surber Rainbow Trout and Bottom Fauna Production in One Mile of Stream , 1937 .

[38]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The Ecology of Running Waters , 1971 .

[39]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE IN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1998 .

[40]  J. Karr,et al.  The effect of fixed-count subsampling on macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in small streams. , 2000 .

[41]  J. Morin,et al.  Spatially explicit model predicting the spawning habitat and early stage mortality of Northern pike (Esox lucius) in a large system: the St. Lawrence River between 1960 and 2000 , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[42]  J. Gore Reservoir manipulations and benthic macroinvertebrates in a Prairie River , 1977, Hydrobiologia.

[43]  Z. Bowen,et al.  Effects of flow regulation on shallow-water habitat dynamics and floodplain connectivity , 2003 .

[44]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[45]  Robert T. Milhous,et al.  Physical habitat simulation system reference manual: version II , 1989 .

[46]  R. Rader,et al.  Influence of mild to severe flow alterations on invertebrates in three mountain streams , 1999 .

[47]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[48]  Christopher W. Hickey,et al.  Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates and the development of generalised Deleatidium spp. habitat suitability curves, applied to four New Zealand rivers , 1991 .

[49]  D. Courtemanch,et al.  Commentary on the Subsampling Procedures Used for Rapid Bioassessments , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[50]  D. Williams,et al.  The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream , 1974 .

[51]  E. Stanley,et al.  Ecosystem Expansion and Contraction in Streams Desert streams vary in both space and time and fluctuate dramatically in size , 1997 .

[52]  R. Death,et al.  A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[53]  B. Chessman,et al.  Ecological responses to artificial drought in two Australian rivers with differing water extraction , 2009 .

[54]  J. Ward,et al.  The macroinvertebrates and fish of a Colorado stream during a period of fluctuating discharge , 1984 .

[55]  P. S. Lake,et al.  Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[56]  R. J. Davidson,et al.  Recovery of benthic macroinvertebrate and epilithic communities following a large flood, in an unstable, braided, New Zealand river , 1988 .

[57]  T. Cuffney,et al.  Ambiguous taxa: effects on the characterization and interpretation of invertebrate assemblages , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[58]  W. Hilsenhoff,et al.  An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution , 2017, The Great Lakes Entomologist.

[59]  James R. Karr,et al.  A Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for Rivers of the Tennessee Valley , 1994 .

[60]  D. Williams,et al.  The recolonization mechanisms of stream benthos , 1976 .

[61]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Two‐dimensional modelling of habitat suitability as a function of discharge on two Colorado rivers , 2005 .

[62]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .

[63]  D. Post,et al.  The Role of Discharge Variation in Scaling of Drainage Area and Food Chain Length in Rivers , 2010, Science.

[64]  J. Gore,et al.  Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.