Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China

Policy makers and scientists consider that land use strategies are designed to provide direct benefits to people by protecting vital ecosystem services. However, due to lack of information and evaluation methods, there is no effective and systematic tool for assessing tradeoffs between direct human benefits and ecosystem services. Land use changes influence ecosystem properties, processes and components, which are the basis for providing services. Five alternative land use scenarios (no conversion of agricultural lands, no urban expansion, agricultural expansion, forestry expansion, and riparian reforestation) were modeled for the Baiyangdian watershed, China, a densely populated, highly modified watershed with serious water shortage and pollution problems. The model InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) is designed to inform decisions about natural resource management, with an aim to align economic forces with conservation. Three ecosystem services (agricultural production, hydropower production, and water quality) were modeled to balance direct benefits and hydrological ecosystem services using InVEST. The results showed that: hydropower production was the greatest in the forestry expansion, but the lowest in agricultural expansion; agricultural production was reduced the most in forestry expansion, while retained the most in riparian reforestation. Riparian reforestation also provided the highest N and P retention and lowest N and P exportation. Riparian reforestation was the optimal land use strategy, since it protected and enhanced the vital ecosystem services without undermining direct human benefits. This research presents an initial analytical framework for integrating direct human benefits and ecosystem services in policy planning and illustrates its application. Although there are important potential tradeoffs between ecosystem services, this systematic planning framework offers a means for identifying valuable synergies between conservation and development.

[1]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[3]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[4]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[5]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[7]  D. Richardson,et al.  Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa , 2009 .

[8]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[9]  T. Blaschke The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital , 2006 .

[10]  A. Gaberščik,et al.  Environmental changes affect ecosystem services of the intermittent Lake Cerknica , 2010 .

[11]  G. Daily,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2001, Science.

[12]  Malin Falkenmark,et al.  Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services , 2010 .

[13]  G. Xie,et al.  Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective , 2010 .

[14]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Modelling natural capital: The case of landscape restoration on the South Downs, England , 2006 .

[15]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[17]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[18]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Water in a changing world , 2001 .

[19]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  Applications of Geographic Information Systems, Remote-Sensing, and a Landscape Ecology Approach to Biodiversity Conservation in the Western Ghats , 1997 .

[21]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[22]  J. B. Ruhl,et al.  The Tragedy of Ecosystem Services , 2008 .

[23]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Walker,et al.  Linking vegetation type and condition to ecosystem goods and services , 2010 .

[25]  B. Bryan,et al.  Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services , 2009 .

[26]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[27]  Burghard C. Meyer,et al.  MULBO: Model framework for multicriteria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial land use decisions , 2008 .

[28]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[29]  N. Crossman,et al.  A conservation industry for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes , 2010 .

[30]  M. C. Kiran,et al.  Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services : Utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate , 2009 .

[31]  Nengwang Chen,et al.  A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: Management implications , 2009 .

[32]  K. Arrow,et al.  The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value , 2000, Science.

[33]  V. Heywood,et al.  Global Biodiversity Assessment , 1996 .

[34]  N. Stork,et al.  Inventorying and monitoring biodiversity. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  D. Horst,et al.  Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[37]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[38]  E. M. Bennett,et al.  Looking to the Future of Ecosystem Services , 2005, Ecosystems.