Analysis and evaluation of the entropy indices of a static network structure

Although degree distribution entropy (DDE), SD structure entropy (SDSE), Wu structure entropy (WSE) and FB structure entropy (FBSE) are four static network structure entropy indices widely used to quantify the heterogeneity of a complex network, previous studies have paid little attention to their differing abilities to describe network structure. We calculate these four structure entropies for four benchmark networks and compare the results by measuring the ability of each index to characterize network heterogeneity. We find that SDSE and FBSE more accurately characterize network heterogeneity than WSE and DDE. We also find that existing benchmark networks fail to distinguish SDSE and FBSE because they cannot discriminate local and global network heterogeneity. We solve this problem by proposing an evolving caveman network that reveals the differences between structure entropy indices by comparing the sensitivities during the network evolutionary process. Mathematical analysis and computational simulation both indicate that FBSE describes the global topology variation in the evolutionary process of a caveman network, and that the other three structure entropy indices reflect only local network heterogeneity. Our study offers an expansive view of the structural complexity of networks and expands our understanding of complex network behavior.

[1]  Ed Reznik,et al.  Graph Curvature for Differentiating Cancer Networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[2]  N. Rashevsky Life, information theory, and topology , 1955 .

[3]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[4]  Tobias Hoßfeld,et al.  Entropy Production in Stationary Social Networks , 2013, CompleNet.

[5]  Wen-Xu Wang,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics induce global symmetry in network controllability , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Wang Bing-Hong,et al.  Network Entropy Based on Topology Configuration and Its Computation to Random Networks , 2008 .

[7]  Du Hai-Feng,et al.  A new network structure entropy based node difference and edge difference , 2011 .

[8]  Cai Meng,et al.  A new network structure entropy based on maximum flow , 2014 .

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[10]  E. Trucco A note on the information content of graphs , 1956 .

[11]  G. Bianconi,et al.  Differential network entropy reveals cancer system hallmarks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Structure and bias in the network autocorrelation model , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Zhu Da-zhi Heterogeneity of Scale-free Network Topology , 2007 .

[14]  Tomislav Lipic,et al.  Predicting the Lifetime of Dynamic Networks Experiencing Persistent Random Attacks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[15]  周涛,et al.  Network Entropy Based on Topology Configuration and Its Computation to Random Networks , 2008 .

[16]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Hui Jing,et al.  Simple scheme to enhance the generation probability of the single-photon-added coherent state , 2008 .

[18]  Yuejin Tan,et al.  Heterogeneity of Scale-free Networks , 2007 .

[19]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[20]  E. Muñoz-Martínez Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness, by Duncan J. Watts, (Princeton Studies in Complexity), Princeton University Press, 1999. $39.50 (hardcover), 262 pp. ISBN: 0-691-00541-9. (Book Reviews) , 2000 .

[21]  Frank Tutzauer,et al.  Entropy as a measure of centrality in networks characterized by path-transfer flow , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[22]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[24]  R. Solé,et al.  Information Theory of Complex Networks: On Evolution and Architectural Constraints , 2004 .