Multi-criteria analysis using latent class cluster ranking: An investigation into corporate resiliency

In this paper, we introduce a multi-stage multiple criteria latent class model within a Bayesian framework that can be used to evaluate and rank-order objects based on multiple performance criteria. The latent variable extraction in our methodology relies on Bayesian analysis and Monte Carlo simulation, which uses a Gibbs sampler. Ranking of clusters of objects is completed using the extracted latent variables. We apply the methodology to evaluate the resiliency of e-commerce companies using balanced scorecard performance dimensions. Cross-validation of the latent class model confirms a superior fit for classifying the e-commerce companies. Specifically, using the methodology we determine the ability of different perspectives of the balanced scorecard method to predict the continued viability and eventual survival of e-commerce companies. The novel methodology may also be useful for performance evaluation and decision making in other contexts. In general, this methodology is useful where a ranking of elements within a set, based on multiple objectives, is desired. A significant advantage of this methodology is that it develops weighting scheme for the multiple objective based on intrinsic characteristics of the set with minimal subjective input from decision makers.

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[2]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model , 2014 .

[3]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century , 2011 .

[4]  P. Seybold,et al.  Customers.com: How to Create a Profitable Business Strategy for the Internet and Beyond , 1998 .

[5]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance , 1996 .

[6]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[7]  G. Mauris,et al.  Quantitative expression and aggregation of performance measurements based on the MACBETH multi-criteria method , 2007 .

[8]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[9]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Strategy Management through Quantitative Modelling of Performance Measurement Systems , 2001 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[11]  Kamel Mellahi,et al.  Does it pay to be a first mover in e.commerce? The case of Amazon.com , 2000 .

[12]  Hassan R. HassabElnaby,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Performance Consequences of Nonfinancial Measures , 2003 .

[13]  Vadlamani Ravi,et al.  Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques - A review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Nils-Göran Olve,et al.  Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard , 1999 .

[15]  R. Sundarraj,et al.  Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies , 2000 .

[16]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement system , 2000 .

[17]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures , 2000 .

[18]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[19]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[20]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[21]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—alternate considerations , 2003 .

[22]  S. Widener,et al.  Managing Value Creation within the Firm: An Examination of Multiple Performance Measures , 2004 .

[23]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[24]  S. Talluri,et al.  A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection , 2002 .

[25]  Chia-Wei Hsu,et al.  Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..